Finding basis for kernal of linear map

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a basis for the kernel of a linear map represented by the matrix A, which transforms 4x1 matrices to 3x1 matrices. The reduced row echelon form of A was calculated, leading to the equations that define the kernel. The initial conclusion suggested a two-dimensional kernel, but further analysis indicated that the kernel is actually one-dimensional. Clarification was provided on the concept of a linear map, emphasizing its role in defining the kernel and the relationship between matrices and vector spaces. Understanding these concepts is crucial for correctly interpreting the problem and finding the kernel's basis.
PhyStan7
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A = 1 3 2 2
1 1 0 -2
0 1 1 2

Viewing A as a linear map from M_(4x1) to M_(3x1) find a basis for the kernal of A and verify directly that these basis vectors are indeed linearly independant.


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so first i found the reduced row echelon form of A. This equals:

rref(A) =

1 0 -1 -4
0 1 1 2
0 0 0 0

So i found the kernal of this by-

1 0 -1 -4
0 1 1 2
0 0 0 0

Multiplied by

x_1
x_2
x_3
x_4

Equals

0
0
0
0.



x_1 = x_3 + x_4
x_2 = -x_3-2x_4
x_3 = x_3
x_4 = x_4

Therefore kernal...

=x_3 {1, -1, 1, 0} + x_4 {1, -2, 0, 1}

So i thought this meant the basis equalled

Basis of kernal = (1,-1,1,0),(1,-2,0,1)


I have idea what to do now though. I have no idea if what i have done is vaguely right and am not sure if it is how to fulfill the rest of the question. The problem is i have not really incoperated the fact that in the question it states that Viewing A as a linear map from M_(4x1) to M_(3x1). I do not understand this terminology, what does it mean exactly?

(ps - i appologise for the bad formatting)


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi PhyStan7! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
PhyStan7 said:
… So i found the kernal of this by-

1 0 -1 -4
0 1 1 2
0 0 0 0

Multiplied by

x_1
x_2
x_3
x_4

Equals

0
0
0
0.



x_1 = x_3 + x_4

Nooo :redface:4x4 :wink:
I have idea what to do now though. I have no idea if what i have done is vaguely right and am not sure if it is how to fulfill therest of the question. The problem is i have not really incoperated the fact that in the question it states that Viewing A as a linear map from M_(4x1) to M_(3x1). I do not understand this terminology, what does it mean exactly?

I assume M4x1 is the 4x1 matrices or column vectors.

So A is a function from the 4-column vectors to the 3-column vectors.

Any (constant) matrix is linear, so it's a linear function (linear map).

Only functions (maps) have kernels, so you have to view the matrix as a map to talk about a kernel. :smile:
 
You want to solve

\begin{bmatrix}1 & 3 & 2 & 2 \\ 1 & 1 & 0 & -2 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}w \\ x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}.



Which is the same as the three equations w+ 3x+ 2y+ 2z= 0, w+ x- 2z= 0, x +y+ z= 0.

Adding the first two equations eliminates z: 2w+ 4x+ 2y= 0. Multiplying the third equation by 2 and adding to the second equation also eliminates z: w+ 3x+ 2y= 0.

Subtracting the second of those from the first eliminaes y: w+ x= 0 so x= -w.

Putting that back into the previous equations will allow you to write each of x, y, and z in terms of w. The kernel is one-dimensional, not two-dimensional.

A "linear map" is a "linear" function from one vector space to another. If f is a linear map then f(au+ bv)= af(u)+ bf(v) fpr any vectors u and v in the domain, any scalars a and b.

You can think of an "m by n" matrix as a linear map from R^m to R^n. Conversely, any linear map from from m-dimensional U to n dimensional V can be written as an m by n matrix for specific bases for U and V.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
69
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top