Finding Brewster's Angle via Fresnel Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the correct Fresnel Equation to derive Brewster's angle, which is expressed as tan(θ) = n2/n1. Participants clarify that using Snell's Law, where θ1 + θ2 = 90 degrees, is essential in the calculations. The reflection coefficient R_p must be set to zero to find Brewster's angle, leading to the conclusion that n1*sin(θ1) = n2*cos(θ1). The final derivation confirms that tan(θB) equals n2/n1. The procedure outlined is validated as correct for solving the problem.
876d34f
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem about this is, which Fresnel Equation am I supposed to use?

Show that the brewster's angle is

\tan(\theta)=\frac{n_{2}}{n_{1}}

but which Fresnel equation do you use

Problem: Using the correct Fresnel Equation using (plugging in) the transmitted angle \theta_{2}

Homework Equations



I figured, If I know the correct Fresnel equation, I would be able to just set my other angle equal to 90 and then I would be able to just solve for \theta and then it would yield \tan of \theta_{2} using Snell's Formula

show or rather derive the Brewster's angle

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone just please verify if this is the correct procedure?

so this is what I wrote on my paper

\frac{\tan(\Theta_{1}-\Theta_{2})}{\tan(\Theta_{1}+\Theta_{2})}

\Theta_{1}+\Theta_{2}=90 Degrees

Using Snell's Law then yields n_{1}\sin(\theta_{1})=n_{2}\sin(\theta_{2})

and then that yields plugging in for \Theta_{2}=90-\Theta_{1}

yields the Brewster's Angle formula by setting R_{p} equal to 0 which is the Reflection Coefficient?

and since \sin(\theta_{2})=\sin(90-\theta_{1})=\cos(\Theta_{1})

Makes it n_{1}\sin(\Theta_{1})=n_{2}\cos(\Theta_{1})

solving for the \Theta value yields

\frac{\sin(\Theta_{1})}{cos(\Theta_{1})}=\frac{n_{2}}{n_{1}}=\tan(\Theta_{B})

Which is just equal to \tan(\Theta_{B})
 
Last edited:
Welcome to Physics Forums.

I didn't follow all your details, but your final answer and starting arguments (θ1 + θ2 = 90o, Snell's Law) are correct.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top