Finding components of the electromagnetic field strength vector?

amolv06
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
2-dimensional components for vectors is easy if you have the magnitude and angle. x is just magnitude*cos, and y is magnitude*sin. But consider this:

Lets say you have a point charge q at (x, y, 0). You want to find the electric field at (0, 0, z). You know that the magnitude of the field is E. I can't figure out how to find the components for E.

I think that:

E_{z} = \left|E\right| \frac{z}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}

However, I can't see what the components for E_{x} and E_{y} would be.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For the moment, ignore components relative to an origin and basis. Don't you have an explicit formula for the electromagnetic field strength vector at any given point?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top