Finding critical temperature from equation of state

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining critical temperature using various equations of state. It is established that for ideal gases, critical temperature cannot be found since the first and second derivatives do not equate to zero. In contrast, the van der Waals equation allows for the identification of critical temperature through similar derivative analysis. The participants explore whether this method applies to other equations of state and clarify that critical temperature is associated with the critical point on a P-V graph. Finally, it is emphasized that the inability of an equation to predict critical temperature does not imply that the gas cannot be liquefied at that temperature in reality.
lkh1986
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the equation of state PV=nRT. So, I get the first derivative and second derivative (P with respect to V) and equate them to 0. Then, I found out that they cannot be equal to 0, so I make the conclusion that no critical temperatue exists for an ideal gas.

If the van der Waals equation is given, I can find the critical temperature by using the same way, namely equate the first and second derivatives to 0. Yeah, critical temperature exists for this case.

But how about other kind of equation of state? Let say P(V-nb)=nRT or (P+a)(V)=nRT. Can we use the same method? (I think we can). And is the CRITICAL temperature here refers to the CRITICAL point on the graph of the plot P versus V? As in the critical/stationary point in the field of mathematics?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am given an equation in a book. Then first I assume there exists a critical point (although it may not exist). Then, I get the first and second derivatives. Then I equate them to 0. And after some calculations, I get 0.25 = 0.125, which is clearly wrong. So, this contradicts with my previous assumption that a critical temperature exists. Therefore, NO critical temperature exists this gas. Is this kind of contradiction method accepted? Because I am told that this popular contradiction method is widely used in mathematics.

Since critical temperature is the highest temperature in which a gas can be liquefy, so if a gas doesn't have a critical temperature, I can say that the gas cannot be liquefy. Is this correct? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you plot P versus V and then at the point of inflection you set the 1st and 2nd derivatives to zero. This is where the critical pt exists. When you only have an equation and no graph whatsoever, you work out the derivatives and see if the critical pt exists.

If you're not sure about your answer , post the equation of state you're working on. If you're very sure that your calculation is correct and the results are contradictory then yes no critical pt can be predicted by this equation.

Since critical temperature is the highest temperature in which a gas can be liquefy, so if a gas doesn't have a critical temperature, I can say that the gas cannot be liquefy. Is this correct? Thanks.

Suppose an equation of state cannot predict Tc for a gas. Does that mean the gas cannot be liquified at Tc? Absolutely not. The equation itself is limited and cannot explain liquifaction for this gas at Tc but that doesn't mean that the gas in reality has no Tc.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top