MHB Finding domain with e functions help

  • Thread starter Thread starter bart11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Functions
AI Thread Summary
To find the domain of the function 1/[e^(x+y)-3], it is necessary to solve the inequality e^(x+y) >= 3. This leads to the condition that x + y cannot equal ln(3) since e^(x+y) must not equal 3 to avoid division by zero. The discussion emphasizes the importance of separating x and y to express the function in the form y = f(x) for domain determination. Taking the natural logarithm of both sides is suggested as a method to isolate the variables. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that x + y must be greater than or equal to ln(3) for the function to be defined.
bart11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm asked to find the domain of 1/[e^(x+y)-3]

Which means I'm solving for e^(x+y)>=3

But how would I go about solving this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
e^(x+y) = e^y*e^x
 
pickslides said:
e^(x+y) = e^y*e^x

Thanks! But hmm, I'm still confused
 
This is supposed to help you separate x & y so you can find a function in the form of y = f(x) and find the domain from there.
 
bart11 said:
I'm asked to find the domain of 1/[e^(x+y)-3]

Which means I'm solving for e^(x+y)>=3

But how would I go about solving this?
The only possible "difficulty" with that is that you cannot divide by 0. That, in turn, means that e^{x+y} cannot be equal to 3. So, what can x+ y not be equal to?

(To solve e^x= a, take the natural logarithm of both sides.)

Pickslide's observation that e^{x+y}= e^xe^y is true but I don't believe using that is particularly useful here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • CodeCogsEqn.gif
    CodeCogsEqn.gif
    382 bytes · Views: 75
  • CodeCogsEqn.gif
    CodeCogsEqn.gif
    515 bytes · Views: 85
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top