MHB Finding domain with e functions help

  • Thread starter Thread starter bart11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain Functions
AI Thread Summary
To find the domain of the function 1/[e^(x+y)-3], it is necessary to solve the inequality e^(x+y) >= 3. This leads to the condition that x + y cannot equal ln(3) since e^(x+y) must not equal 3 to avoid division by zero. The discussion emphasizes the importance of separating x and y to express the function in the form y = f(x) for domain determination. Taking the natural logarithm of both sides is suggested as a method to isolate the variables. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that x + y must be greater than or equal to ln(3) for the function to be defined.
bart11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm asked to find the domain of 1/[e^(x+y)-3]

Which means I'm solving for e^(x+y)>=3

But how would I go about solving this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
e^(x+y) = e^y*e^x
 
pickslides said:
e^(x+y) = e^y*e^x

Thanks! But hmm, I'm still confused
 
This is supposed to help you separate x & y so you can find a function in the form of y = f(x) and find the domain from there.
 
bart11 said:
I'm asked to find the domain of 1/[e^(x+y)-3]

Which means I'm solving for e^(x+y)>=3

But how would I go about solving this?
The only possible "difficulty" with that is that you cannot divide by 0. That, in turn, means that e^{x+y} cannot be equal to 3. So, what can x+ y not be equal to?

(To solve e^x= a, take the natural logarithm of both sides.)

Pickslide's observation that e^{x+y}= e^xe^y is true but I don't believe using that is particularly useful here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • CodeCogsEqn.gif
    CodeCogsEqn.gif
    382 bytes · Views: 74
  • CodeCogsEqn.gif
    CodeCogsEqn.gif
    515 bytes · Views: 81
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top