Finding Electric Field in Spherical Electrostatics: Vector Specification?

Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
I have a problem in electrostatics in which there is a uniformly charges semi-sphere of radius a with its base in the xy-plane and I want to find the electricfiled at some point h on the z-axis. What I am having trouble with is that how do you specify the vector that goes from an infinitesimal point on the surface of the sphere to the point h on the z axis? Would it be just h\hat{r} - a\hat{r}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vector addition. You want the vector that goes from a point on the sphere to a point (0,0,h) on the z axis. Well, that's -a\hat{r}+h\hat{z}.
 
Is that valid? Can you mix spherical and rectangular coordinates together like that?

Anyways, how would you find its magnitude? Would you just take the squareroot of the dot product? Something like this:

\vec{R} = h\hat{z} - a\hat{r}

|\vec{R}|^2 = \vec{R}\cdot\vec{R}

= ( h\hat{z} - a\hat{r} )\cdot( h\hat{z} - a\hat{r} ) = h^2\hat{z}\cdot\hat{z} + a^2\hat{r}\cdot\hat{r} = h^2 + a^2

Is this correct? Doesn't look right though...
 
Remember that \hat{r} = (a\hat{i} + b\hat{j}+c\hat{k}) so you can take the dot product of the z xomponent and the spherical component, where a,b and c are spherical components...look them up in a reference book.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top