Finding Equation of a Graph: Tips & Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter DjDukes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
DjDukes
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
I am wondering how to go about finding the equation of a graph of the following form. I understand how to make a graph oscillate but not in this way.

graph.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please, don't anyone just blurt out what the answer is. Let him figure it out.

Hint: Of all the math operations you have ever seen, can you think of one where it grows up to a certain point and then suddenly drops back to the starting value and does this over and over again? Think until you remember that one. Now you might not have ever thought about plotting that, but plot it now and see what it looks like. This will not look exactly like what you have above. So what do you remember about Math 100 that would tell you how to make little changes until you get it to look like what you have above.
 
Bill Simpson said:
Please, don't anyone just blurt out what the answer is. Let him figure it out.

Hint: Of all the math operations you have ever seen, can you think of one where it grows up to a certain point and then suddenly drops back to the starting value and does this over and over again? Think until you remember that one. Now you might not have ever thought about plotting that, but plot it now and see what it looks like. This will not look exactly like what you have above. So what do you remember about Math 100 that would tell you how to make little changes until you get it to look like what you have above.

No I can't think of one hence why I asked. I am just looking for a straight answer so I can analyse my data not learn mathematics since I am not a mathematician or trying to be one. This isn't for any sort of homework or something if that's why your being cryptic.



I forgot to clarify in the 1st post i just noticed. The graph actually only goes so high. and only drops so far. It is also linear in shape. The highest point is 12 the lowest is 10.7 and the drops are at regular intervals.
 
Last edited:
The Mod function, which means the remainder after division, looks a lot like what you want. You provided information on the vertical boundaries but not how often it repeats. So I'll guess that 12-((x+.65)mod 1.3) might be what you are looking for.

To try to explain mod 1.3 to you,
2.6=2*1.3+0 so 2.6 mod 1.3=0
2.7=2*1.3+0.1 so 2.7 mod 1.3=0.1
etc.
So in that equation above, you pick any value for x, add .65, either use division or subtraction to remove as many multiples of 1.3 as possible until the result is less than 1.3 but greater than zero and 12-your result will be what you want to plot on a graph.

Here is a graph of that for you
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=graph+12-((x+.65)+mod+1.3)
Gently adjust the constants to get it closer to what you need. Or tell me the position of the upper left and lower right corners of anyone of your diagonal lines and I'll give you a tweaked equation for your plot.

Or if you need some other way of describing this then try to tell me how you need this done and I'll see what I can do.
 
Last edited:
yes that is exactly what I was looking for now to figure out how to apply this to the other graph I have to hopefully get some results! Thanks for the help.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top