Finding equilibrium distance of an orbiting particle.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equilibrium position r for a mass m in circular orbit around a central mass Ms, considering both masses have the same orbital period. The initial approach involves setting equations related to eccentricity and orbital mechanics to zero, leading to potential expressions for r. However, the contributor realizes that calculating the period of mass m in relation to the other masses is essential for accuracy. The conversation hints at the need to consider net forces acting on mass m and suggests the relevance of Lagrange points in this context. The contributor seeks clarification on whether to assume mass m is significantly smaller than the other two masses.
phosgene
Messages
145
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



In the diagram below, masses m and Me are in circular orbit about Ms with the same period.

http://min.us/i/lprtU83D9cGR

Derive an expression for the equilibrium position r of mass m.

Homework Equations



For a circular orbit, the eccentricity, e = 0.

e=\sqrt{1+2mEh^{2}k^{-2}}=\frac{mrv^{2}}{GMm}-1

Where h=\frac{L}{m}, k=-GMm

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I'm kind of assuming that I simply set one of these equations to zero and solve for r, to get something like:

r=\sqrt{\frac{-G^{2}M_{s}^{2}m}{2Ev^{2}}} (which will not be imaginary because in an elliptical orbit E<0)

or

r=\frac{GM_{s}}{v^{2}}

Is it really that simple though? It's a 4 mark question.

**EDIT** I think the above is wrong. I think I should have calculated the period of the mass m in terms of the two other masses, then equated it with the period of the other mass. I think I've got it now!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think that you need to consider the net force on mass m.
 
Sounds like you're finding Lagrange points. Are you told to assume m << Me << Ms?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top