Finding Equilibrium Forces: Are My Vector Calculations Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IGeekbot
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying vector calculations for equilibrium forces in physics. The first problem involves three forces, with the user calculating the third force to be 74.3N at 253 degrees, which is confirmed to be correct (actually 74.4N). In the second problem, the user calculates the sixth force needed for equilibrium among five given forces, arriving at 33.97N at 43 degrees, but corrections indicate it should be 34.2N at 223 degrees. The importance of careful calculations and not rounding off intermediate results is emphasized. Overall, the thread highlights common challenges in understanding vector equilibrium in introductory physics.
IGeekbot
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Ok, I am in an intro to physics, so it is all trig based. But I just need to know if I did these vector problems right.


an object in equilibrium has 3 forces exerted on it. one at 90 degress is 33N, one at 60 degrees is 44N. Find the third.


Using the sine and cosine of those vectors, i got the thrid force to be 74.3N at 253 degrees. Is that right?


ANd the other one is: five forces act on an object, the first is 60N at 90 degrees, the second is 40N at o degrees, the third is 80N at 270 degrees, te fourth is 50N at 60 degrees, and the fifth is 40N at 180 degrees. what's the sixth force that puts the object in equilibrium?

I know that the 2 40N forces cancel, so i just found the vertical and horizontal force of the other three forces. Then after using more sin and cos laws, and

Fnet6^2 =Fnetx^2 + Fnety^2

I got the force should be 33.97N, and using tanget, it should be at 43 degrees.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi IGeekBot,

The first answer is correct. (Actually 74.4 N)

For the second, it should be at 223 degrees (180+43 degrees), watch the signs.
Since the sum of all forces is zero (equilibrium), you have:
F_6^2+F_{netx}^2+F_{nety}^2=0.
(F_{netx} and F_{nety} do not include F_6)
The magnitude is 34.17 N. Be careful not to round off in intermediary stages of the calculation.
 
The first one is correct but for the seond one, i got 34.2 N at 223 degree from the positive x axis.
 
Last edited:
thanks, our teacher is a bit hazy sometimes, and it sems th ewhole group was lost on this.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top