Finding error margin when one term is 0

AI Thread Summary
When measuring error margins, particularly with expected values of zero, traditional calculations become problematic. In experiments involving conservation of momentum, if the measured value deviates from zero, it raises questions about the validity of the measurement itself. For example, if the momentum after a collision is slightly off from zero, calculating error percentages can yield undefined results. Instead, using relative error based on the closest non-zero measurements can provide insight. Ultimately, the focus should be on understanding measurement accuracy and the implications of error in experimental results.
Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
In our labs we often need to find the error percent between the expected value and the measured value. So if we expected to get a value of 9.8 m/s2 for g but got 9.9 m/s2 instead, we say that the error was (9.9 - 9.8)/9.8 % = 1.02%. But what happens if we expect a value of 0 for something, and measure 1cm instead?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Chen,

Are you really measuring something whose correct length is zero, or are you measuring two non-zero lengths that are supposed to be the same?
 
It is an experiment about conservation of momentum and energy in an elastic collision. The original momentum in the Y axis is 0, so the total momentum in that axis after the collision must also equal 0. Dropping the units for a second, let's say that the momentum in the Y axis after collision is (6) + (-5.9) = 0.1. What's the error percent then? :smile:
 
Undefined, that's what.
 
Chen said:
It is an experiment about conservation of momentum and energy in an elastic collision. The original momentum in the Y axis is 0, so the total momentum in that axis after the collision must also equal 0. Dropping the units for a second, let's say that the momentum in the Y axis after collision is (6) + (-5.9) = 0.1. What's the error percent then? :smile:

How about .1/6 or .1/5.9 depending on whether 6 or 5.9 is more likely to be correct?
 
Compute the error in each of your measured values (.6) (.59) Then compute either a room mean square error or just use the Max error for the error of the final computation. It may be that your error will be larger then your final result. In which case you can claim to have a correct measuement within your error.

\mbox{rms} = \sqrt {{ \Delta x_1 }^2 + {\Delta x_2}^2}
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top