Finding Joint PDF of Two Exponential Random Variables

AI Thread Summary
To find the joint PDF of two independent exponential random variables, the joint density function is the product of their individual PDFs. For the given variables, Y has a parameter λ=4 and X has λ=3, leading to their respective PDFs. The correct approach to find the PDF of W=X+Y involves using the convolution of the two PDFs, not the expected value formula. A referenced article clarifies the correct method for calculating the density of the sum of independent random variables. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding independence in probability density functions.
EugP
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Can anyone tell me how to find the joint PDF of two random variables? I can't seem to find an explanation anywhere. I'm trying to solve a problem but I'm not sure where to go with it:

Y is an exponential random variable with parameter \lambda=4. X is also an exponential random variable and independent of Y with \lambda=3.. Find the PDF f_W(w), where W=X+Y.

I know that I simply use:

f_W(w) = \int\int (x+y) f_{X,Y}(x,y)dydx

The problem is that I don't know how to find their joint PDF. I know their PDF's separately:


f_X(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}3e^{-3x},&amp;<br /> x\geq 0\\0, &amp; otherwise\end{array}\right.

f_Y(y)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}4e^{-4x},&amp;<br /> x\geq 0\\0, &amp; otherwise\end{array}\right.

Would this help me in anyway? Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the joint density function is simply the product of the individual density functions
see here under independence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_density_function
in that article you also find the correct formula for the density of X+Y, what you have there seems to be the formula for E[X+Y] imho
 
judoudo said:
the joint density function is simply the product of the individual density functions
see here under independence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_density_function
in that article you also find the correct formula for the density of X+Y, what you have there seems to be the formula for E[X+Y] imho

Yeah sorry I realized I made a mistake, and that link helped a lot. Thank you!
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top