Finding Limits of Functions with Multiple Sets of Variables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating limits of functions with variables from different sets, specifically examining the limit of f(n,q) = n/q as n approaches infinity and q approaches infinity. It highlights the application of L'Hospital's rule, noting that it can be used when both the numerator and denominator approach infinity, yielding a limit of 1 for the simpler function. However, complications arise with more complex functions, such as f(n,q) = (n+q)/(q-n)^2, where discontinuities and multiple variables complicate the use of L'Hospital's rule. The importance of clearly defining the variables and their relationships is emphasized, as it affects the limit evaluation process. Ultimately, the discussion underscores the necessity of careful formulation when dealing with limits involving multiple variable sets.
Mathoholic!
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I'm familiarized with finding limits of most kinds of functions. I was struck by a problem: What if the variables of the function belong to different sets of numbers?

My point being, given the function:

f(n,q)=\frac{n}{q}

With n belonging to the set of natural numbers and q belonging to the set of rational numbers.

How do I avaluate the following limit (if possible):

lim f(n,q) as n→∞ and q→∞

This may be a silly question but care to answer please.

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am not 100% certain but I believe L'Hospital's rule still applies to multivariable functions if both the top and bottom functions are going to infinity. That would make:

lim f(n,q) as n→∞ and q→∞ = 1

only because you can take the derivative of what is upstairs and the derivative of what is downstairs with simplicity. I don't think this method would work if you had say, a function like:

f(n,q) = (n+q) / (q-n)^2

because then you would have multiple variables locked upstairs and downstairs and it would become a mess with partial derivations.
 
That function is discontinous along one axis. Don't think L'Hospital can be used then.
 
Mathoholic! said:
I'm familiarized with finding limits of most kinds of functions. I was struck by a problem: What if the variables of the function belong to different sets of numbers?

My point being, given the function:

f(n,q)=\frac{n}{q}

With n belonging to the set of natural numbers and q belonging to the set of rational numbers.

How do I avaluate the following limit (if possible):

lim f(n,q) as n→∞ and q→∞

This may be a silly question but care to answer please.

Thank you

You have to define your n and q better.

As an example, let's take the limit ##\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\lfloor x \rfloor}{x}##, where ##x \in \mathbb{R}##

You can't simply apply L' Hopital's because the numerator is a discontinuous function.

But you can find the limit by defining the fractional part of x as ##\{x\}## and rewriting the limit as:

##\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x - \{x\}}{x} = 1 - \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\{x\}}{x} = 1##

So a lot depends on exactly what you intend the numerator and denominator to signify.
 
Mathoholic! said:
How do I avaluate the following limit (if possible):

lim f(n,q) as n→∞ and q→∞

Do you mean ##\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\lim_{q \rightarrow \infty} \frac{n}{q}## or ##\lim_{q \rightarrow \infty} \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{n}{q}##?

I was struck by a problem: What if the variables of the function belong to different sets of numbers?

The general theory is that of nets.
 
Last edited:
Curious3141 said:
You have to define your n and q better.

As an example, let's take the limit ##\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\lfloor x \rfloor}{x}##, where ##x \in \mathbb{R}##

You can't simply apply L' Hopital's because the numerator is a discontinuous function.

But you can find the limit by defining the fractional part of x as ##\{x\}## and rewriting the limit as:

##\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x - \{x\}}{x} = 1 - \lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\{x\}}{x} = 1##

So a lot depends on exactly what you intend the numerator and denominator to signify.

Very cool! Thanks for the correction.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top