Finding Lower Bounds for {2, 4} using Partial Order

  • Thread starter Thread starter BubblesAreUs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Pair
BubblesAreUs
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
Since I'm not sure if posting assignment questions is allowed, I'm just going to ask specific questions just to be safe.

1. Homework Statement


Find all the lower bounds of given pair. Say (a, b) in T.

Homework Equations



Proof for greatest lower bound:

∀g,a,b ∈ T ⇔ ( g ≺ a) ^ (g ≺ b) ^ ( ∀l ∈ T [ (l ≺ a ) ^ ( l ≺ b)] ⇒ (l ≺ g)

by "≺", I meant Partial Order, ≤

The Attempt at a Solution



Since g are ordered before a and b. Can we assume for pair {2, 4}, g will be equivalent to

{empty set}, {1,0}, {1,1}, {1,2}, {1,3}, {1,4}, {2, 1}, {2,2}, {2,3}, {2,4},

I am not sure if I'm on the right track, but that's what it seems to be according to the proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part 1 you write (a, b) which could be an ordered pair or an open interval in ℝ but then you use set notation in part 3. Those could have greatest lower bounds if there's a partial ordering defined on them but I think I need more info. Part 2 makes sense though, a lower bound different from g is less than g but what are they & how are they being compared?

edit: for example with {2, 4} ⊆ (ℕ, ≤) (meaning the set is ℕ & its partial order is ordinary < or =) the greatest lower bound is 2 & the other lower bound is 1. If {2, 4} ⊆ (ℤ, ≤) then the glb is still 2 but the other lower bounds are all the integers less than 2 .
 
Last edited:
So if the proof for lower bound was applied to the pair {2,4} in T.

∀g,2,4 ∈ T ⇔ ( g ≺ 2) ^ (g ≺ 4) ^ ( ∀l ∈ T [ (l ≺ 2 ) ^ ( l ≺ 4)] ⇒ (l ≺ g)

In other words, g comes before 2 and 4 while l comes before g. I'm trying to compute the lower bound of the given pair. I also forgot to mention that T = ( X8, ≺ ) where ≺ is defined on X8 = { 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8} by the rule x ≺ y ⇔ 5x ≤ 3y.

Therefore I was able to produce the pairs:

{empty set}, {0,0}, {0,1}, {0,2}, {0,3,}, {0,4}, {1,2}, {1,3}, {1,4}, {2,4},

Each of pairs produced go before their respective elements.

Is this correct?
 
Now that I understand how you got those pairs, once you know that ##2 \prec 4## because 5×2 ≤ 3×4 you don't need to compare 4 with any lesser elements because it obviously isn't a lower bound for {2, 4}. The way I understood the problem was that you want ##x \in X_{8}## such that ##x \prec 2##, in other words x such that 5×x ≤ 3×2 = 6 which I think you got but you need to give the elements (not subsets) of ##X_{8}## that are lower bounds of {2, 4}, which are 0, 1 & 2. The glb is 2 because it's the lower bound which is greater than the other ones.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top