Finding Max & Min Values of f(x)= x^(4/5)*(x-4)^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quadruple Bypass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the critical points of the function f(x) = x^(4/5)*(x-4)^2. Participants are exploring the differentiation process and the manipulation of exponents involved in the product rule.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the steps taken after applying the product rule, particularly regarding the multiplication by x^(1/5) to eliminate fractional exponents. Other participants clarify this multiplication and its purpose in simplifying the equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively clarifying the steps involved in the differentiation process, particularly focusing on the manipulation of exponents. There is a clear exchange of ideas, with some participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem without reaching a consensus on the final steps.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding the professor's instructions and the implications of multiplying by x^(1/5), indicating that the original poster may have constraints in understanding the manipulation of exponents in this context.

Quadruple Bypass
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
OK, the professor did this problem for us as an example and i got lost somewhere in between. the problem was: find the critical points
f(x)= x^(4/5)*(x-4)^2

then he used the product rule to get

f '(x)= 4/5 x^(-1/5) *(x-4)^2 + x^(4/5) * 2(x-4) = 0

THEN, the part that threw me off was the next part where he said multiply both sides by 1/5...what did he mean by that? after that you get

4/5 (x-4)^2 + 2x(x-4) = 0 and so on...

my question is how and what did he do to get rid of the x^(-1/5) and the x^(4/5)? :confused:

Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiply both sides by
[tex]x^{\frac{1}{5}}[/tex]
 
He multiplied both sides by [tex]x^{1/5}[/tex], not 1/5.
 
Don't multiply by 1/5, try multiplying by x^(1/5). The whole idea is to turn the exponents into integers, and then you can use the usual methods to find the roots of the equation.
 
Last edited:
He is not multiplying by 1/5, he is multiplying by x^(1/5). On the zero side, it of course goes away. On the other side, it distributes and x^(1/5)*x^(-1/5)=1 while x^(1/5)*x^(4/5)=x nicely killing off those pesky rational exponents. Good Luck
 
WOOHOOO! Thanks very much!
 
"Never seen such unanimity of opinion before in my life"
Poobah, in "The Mikado"
 
And who said mathmaticians don't have a sense of humor??

:biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K