Finding Mechanical Energy without knowing Efficiency

AI Thread Summary
To find the Mechanical Energy expended during a 72-minute hike up a 400-meter mountain, the total energy consumed is calculated as 727.2 kcal based on a consumption rate of 10.1 kcal/min. However, this total includes energy lost as heat, and the challenge lies in determining the efficiency of the energy conversion. The relevant equation for Mechanical Energy (ME) is ME = (Efficiency x Eout)/100, where Eout is the total energy expended. The potential energy (PE) gained from climbing can be calculated using the formula PE = mgh, which represents the energy used to lift the man's mass against gravity. Ultimately, understanding the distinction between total energy expended and useful Mechanical Energy is crucial for solving the problem.
jennyskywalker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 65 kg man goes for a 72 minute hike up a mountain that is 400.0 metres in vertical height. The energy consumption rate for this climb is 10.1 kcal/min. What is the Mechanical Energy (useful work energy) expended for this hike? (in kcal)


Homework Equations


ME= (Efficiency x Eout)/100

The Attempt at a Solution


10.1 x 72 = 727.2 (Therefore Eout=727.2) But I don't know the efficiency! So how do I figure this out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much energy must the man expend to lift his mass up the mountain?
 
SteamKing said:
How much energy must the man expend to lift his mass up the mountain?

727.2 kcal? But that is the total energy expended, including heat energy. ME=(efficiency x 727.2)/100. That's all I know!
 
I asked on another forum, and they said ME= mgh, but according to my teacher, PE (potential energy)=mgh, and I'm looking for Mechanical energy!
 
energy is energy.

The man expended so many kcal thru his metabolism while walking up the hill. That you have calculated.

However, in moving his mass up the hill, a certain portion of this energy was consumed in moving his mass up the hill against gravity. This energy is equal to the change in gravitational potential from the bottom of the hill to the top.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top