Finding minimum angle of friction.

AI Thread Summary
To find the minimum angle of friction for a ladder leaning against a frictionless wall, the discussion emphasizes setting up the equilibrium equations correctly. The user attempts to establish a torque balance using forces acting on the ladder, specifically focusing on normal force and friction. A sign error in the torque calculation is noted, indicating that the second term should represent counter-clockwise torque. Participants suggest correcting this error and combining it with the friction equation and the conditions for vertical and horizontal force equilibrium. Properly addressing these elements will lead to deriving the formula for the minimum angle at which the ladder will not slip.
pooface
Messages
207
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform ladder of mass m and length L leans at an angle of theta against a frictionless wall. If the coefficient of static friction between the ladder and the ground is mu, determine a formula for the minimum angle at which the ladder will not slip.

I have added my own additional information in red.

Homework Equations


various equations perhaps.

mu= Ffr/FN
Ffr is friction force.
FW is force by the wall


The Attempt at a Solution


http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1830/s8sv4.jpg
this is what I have done. I took my ref point at the top of the ladder.

(FN)(Lcostheta) + (Ffr)(Lsintheta) = (mass*g)(L/2 costheta)
I don't know if this approach is correct. I doubt it.

Can someone give me head start here?...I have been stuck on this problem for a while now. How do I set this up?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
pooface said:
this is what I have done. I took my ref point at the top of the ladder.

(FN)(Lcostheta) + (Ffr)(Lsintheta) = (mass*g)(L/2 costheta)
I don't know if this approach is correct. I doubt it.
Nothing wrong with this approach. Except for a sign error: the second term is a counter-clockwise torque.

Fix that error and keep going. Combine this with the friction equation. And with the fact that vertical and horizontal forces must add to zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top