Finding natural frequency of a steel flat

AI Thread Summary
To find the fundamental frequency of a steel flat with dimensions L=1000 mm, B=100 mm, and T=10 mm, fixed at both ends and with weights suspended at 250 mm and 750 mm, Dunkerley's method can be applied. This involves calculating the natural frequency due to the beam's weight and the deflection caused by each point load separately. The overall frequency can then be estimated using Dunkerley's formula, which may slightly underestimate the actual frequency. Additional resources provide detailed engineering approaches for more complex scenarios. This method offers a practical approximation for determining the natural frequency of the specified steel flat.
lonthia
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
is there a straight formula for finding one of the natural (preferably fundamental) frequency of a steel flat with dimension say, L=1000 mm, B=100 mm and Thickness T=10 mm ? The flat is fixed at both ends by bolts and two weights of equal magnitude are suspended at 1/4 and 3/4 (i.e. 250 mm and 750 mm) of the flat.

I am yet to find understandable solution to the above problem on the net; so I had to post it to this forum. Please help, I am lost.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lonthia said:
is there a straight formula for finding one of the natural (preferably fundamental) frequency of a steel flat with dimension say, L=1000 mm, B=100 mm and Thickness T=10 mm ? The flat is fixed at both ends by bolts and two weights of equal magnitude are suspended at 1/4 and 3/4 (i.e. 250 mm and 750 mm) of the flat.

I am yet to find understandable solution to the above problem on the net; so I had to post it to this forum. Please help, I am lost.

This article gives an engineering approach to estimating the fundamental frequency of a shaft under various end conditions and loadings:

http://www.impactap.com/joe/Chapter%207.pdf

Dunkerley's method is outlined in this article:

http://www.freestudy.co.uk/dynamics/free vibrations.pdf

Basically, you can calculate the natural frequency of the beam under just its own weight, and under the deflection due to each point load, separately, and then find the overall frequency by using Dunkerley's formula. This formula tends to underestimate the actual value of the frequency. There are more complicated approaches to finding the natural frequency, but this should give a close approximation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top