Finding Omega and Zeta from a Magnitude and Phase Plot

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 4K views
Loppyfoot
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've been asked to estimate ωn and ζ from the magnitude and phase plot of an atomic force microscope. The magnitude and phase plot is attached.

Does anyone know how to solve for these values?
W0nWUxM.png
 
on Phys.org
NascentOxygen said:
The -3dB bandwidth will give you Q, and Q is related to ζ

Could you elaborate? Where does this -3dB bandwidth come from? Is Q inversely related to the damping ratio, ζ?

Thanks for your help.
 
I was able to calculate the value for the damping ratio; but I am having trouble finding the value of the natural frequency. Any ideas on how to solve for the natural frequency?
 
Loppyfoot said:
I was able to calculate the value for the damping ratio; but I am having trouble finding the value of the natural frequency. Any ideas on how to solve for the natural frequency?
Because the system is so underdamped, the natural frequency is practically equal to the frequency where the response peaks. (Which looks suspiciously co-incident with that 90° crossing on the phase plot, though off-hand I can't say that's right.) I suppose you are approximating this to a second-order system?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Because the system is so underdamped, the natural frequency is practically equal to the frequency where the response peaks. (Which looks suspiciously co-incident with that 90° crossing on the phase plot, though off-hand I can't say that's right.) I suppose you are approximating this to a second-order system?

Yes, I am assuming that the AFM cantilever is being modeled as a second order system. With the cantilever tune, the phase curve is set to 90° of the resonant frequency. So would I be close enough in estimating that the natural frequency is 72.7 kHz?
 
Loppyfoot said:
Yes, I am assuming that the AFM cantilever is being modeled as a second order system. With the cantilever tune, the phase curve is set to 90° of the resonant frequency. So would I be close enough in estimating that the natural frequency is 72.7 kHz?
Most likely. Though there is an equation relating frequency at the peak and ζ back to Ѡn if you really wanted to be precise.

The phase in a true second order system approaches 180° at infinity, so your system seems to have some higher order term because it apparently goes beyond 220°.