Loren Booda
- 3,108
- 4
Or, what is your reason for living?
My daughters. Maybe a certain special someone that might come along.Loren Booda said:Or, what is your reason for living?
Loren Booda said:Or, what is your reason for living?
marlon said:My sole purpose in life is to get rich or die trying.
marlon
Well, according to my cats, I pretty much exist just to kiss their little butts.
I knew I liked you for some unknown reason! Since I'm not rich, famous, or handsome, (I KNOW! I can't believe it either!) I believe I'm to be here to be good and help someone. My secondary quest is the search for spiritual creaminess.Astronuc said:To be.
To serve humanity to the best of my abilities and to provide for the future.
To make the world a better place than when I came into it.
That's the life purpose for the all-time great minds of our day and age, as it has always been. Only geniuses like Mozart, Einstein, Bohr, etc etc are able to achieve that purpose. WE ARE NOT.Shahil said:There's a life lesson their...do we live to enlighten and advance humanity
YES, it's called surviving. The average Jo Schmoe (which most of us are) can, at best, achieve this goal.OR is the real purpose of life to find a way to find the easiest way to live a life of luxury and excess with minimal regard for anyone else...
hmm...
That's the life purpose for the all-time great minds of our day and age, as it has always been. Only geniuses like Mozart, Einstein, Bohr, etc etc are able to achieve that purpose. WE ARE NOT.
YES, it's called surviving. The average Jo Schmoe (which most of us are) can, at best, achieve this goal.
When did you adopt a fruit bat?Evo said:Oh yes, to feed my cats (and the possums of the world) and bring home fresh fruit salads for my fruit bat.
It's my dog, Ricco.zoobyshoe said:When did you adopt a fruit bat?
marlon said:That's the life purpose for the all-time great minds of our day and age, as it has always been. Only geniuses like Mozart, Einstein, Bohr, etc etc are able to achieve that purpose. WE ARE NOT.
YES, it's called surviving. The average Jo Schmoe (which most of us are) can, at best, achieve this goal.
marlon
Astronuc said:Death is the last thing I plan to do in this world.![]()
Echo 6 Sierra said:I knew I liked you for some unknown reason! Since I'm not rich, famous, or handsome, (I KNOW! I can't believe it either!) I believe I'm to be here to be good and help someone. My secondary quest is the search for spiritual creaminess.
Eh?spiritual creaminess.
moose said:I'll never die, so I will find out someday
EDIT: So who else actually thinks they will never die?
I am not talking about famous people here, i am talking about exceptionally gifted people. They make the difference, they make the big contributions. What we do (ie the commoners like you and me) is not bad but it is neglgible with respect to the advancement of humankind.Entropy said:Bull. You don't have to be famous to improve humanity.
Wrong, Einstein never supported that particular implementation of his theories. Besides, this is an argument you can state about almost every onject that is known to mankind.I mean, without him we wouldn't have the nuclear bomb.
Yes there is, i am talking about average (physical, intellectual,...)capabilities.There is no such things as an average individual.
You say that like "regular people" (which don't actually exist) are like the scum of the earth
Again, you are mixing fame with capabilities.and that the famous are gods among men.
The chance of us doing actually something great is very small. With "something great" i mean, a new idea that really advances mankind. This can be for example a scientific development, writing a great piece of music, inveting new software that makes life much more easy, etc etcMaybe you see yourself as insignificant, but that's not what I see in myself.
Kazza_765 said:"Joe Schmoe" had the desire and the motivation to live for the advancement and preservation of humanity, rather than hoping one day they can afford to buy a nice new shiny SUV with a sunroof and live in a big house with a pool and tennis court.
No, it was inevitable once the nuclear structure of matter was discovered. Rutherford's experiments with alpha particle showed the dense nuclear core of an atom, Chadwick determined the existence of the neutron (1932), Otto Hahn and F. Strassmann (1936 to 1938)(http://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/1944/press.html) discovered the fission process with a lot of work from Lise Meitner, and Fermi and Leo Szilard started thinking about the priniciples of a chain reaction.I mean, without him [Einstein] we wouldn't have the nuclear bomb.
No, it was inevitable once the nuclear structure of matter was discovered.
What we do (ie the commoners like you and me) is not bad but it is neglgible with respect to the advancement of humankind.
Besides, this is an argument you can state about almost every onject that is known to mankind.
Yes there is, i am talking about average (physical, intellectual,...)capabilities.