Finding Range of Weak Interaction from Mass of Z Boson

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the range of weak interactions using the mass of the Z boson, which is 91 GeV/c². Participants explore the relationship between mass and length through dimensional analysis and the Yukawa potential, expressing confusion about how to apply these concepts correctly. One user attempts to derive the wavelength associated with the Z boson using the equation λ = h/(mc), arriving at an approximate value of 1.4 * 10^-16 m. Clarifications are made regarding the proper use of constants and the significance of potential values in determining the range. The conversation emphasizes the connection between energy, mass, and distance in particle physics.
div4200
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One of the mediators of the weak interactions is the Z boson, which has a mass of 91 GeV/c
2.

Use this information to find an approximate value for the range of the weak interaction.

Homework Equations



This is the part that I am having trouble with. I don't know where to look for information about this, and it doesn't seem to be in my book. All I ask is that someone point me to a resource where I can read about that topic. I would appreciate it greatly. Thanks in advance!

The Attempt at a Solution



(see above)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One way to approach the problem is just by dimensional analysis. What length scale corresponds to the mass? A better way, which gives essentially the same answer is to determine the corresponding Yukawa potential http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukawa_potential for Z-boson exchange.
 
Thanks. But I'm still somewhat confused. How can mass and length be related using dimensional analysis?

I also read the article about Yukawa potential, but I'm not sure how to use it. I would think that you would set V = 0 , but that yields the solution r = ∞, which cannot be right.

Thanks.
 
I just thought of something. What if I do,

E = mc2 = hc/\lambda

And so:

\lambda = h/(mc)

Plugging in the following values:

h = 4.13566733 * 10-15 eV*s
c = 2.99792458 * 108 m/s
m = 9.1 * 109 eV/c2

I get

\lambda \approx 1.4 * 10-16 m

Is that correct? Thanks a lot.
 
div4200 said:
Thanks. But I'm still somewhat confused. How can mass and length be related using dimensional analysis?

Any mass is related to an energy by multiplying by c^2. Any energy is inversely related to a length by a factor of \hbar c. For instance, the relation between energy and wavelength of a photon is

\lambda = \frac{\hbar c}{E}.

I also read the article about Yukawa potential, but I'm not sure how to use it. I would think that you would set V = 0 , but that yields the solution r = ∞, which cannot be right.

Thanks.

You would be better off asking a question like: over what distance does the potential decrease by half? Be sure to avoid choosing r=0 or r=\infty as reference points.
 
Ah I think I see now. So my method was correct, then?

And isn't your h-bar actually supposed to be h since E = hv?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top