Finding Real Function for Improper Integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter boombaby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a real function \( f \) defined on the interval \( (0,1] \) that is integrable on \( [c,1] \) for every \( c > 0 \), while ensuring that the integral \( \int^{1}_{0} f(x)dx \) exists but \( \int^{1}_{0}|f(x)|dx \) does not. Participants explore various function forms and integration techniques related to improper integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the behavior of functions similar to alternating series and consider piecewise definitions. There are attempts to analyze integrals involving sine functions and their convergence properties. Questions arise regarding the integrability of absolute values of functions and the implications of specific integral bounds.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and suggestions to refine their approaches. Some participants have made progress in proving certain integrals converge, while others express uncertainty about specific steps in their reasoning. There is no explicit consensus on a final function or method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the types of solutions or methods they can employ. There is a focus on understanding the behavior of functions near singularities and the implications for integrability.

boombaby
Messages
129
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a real function f on (0,1] and integrable on [c,1] for every c>0, such that [tex]\int^{1}_{0} f(x)dx[/tex] exists but [tex]\int^{1}_{0}|f(x)|dx[/tex] fails to exist

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think such function should behavior like the sequence 1-1/2+1/3-1/4+...+(-1)^n-1 1/n+...so I came up to something like [tex]\frac{1}{x^2}[/tex] sin([tex]\frac{1}{x}[/tex])
But this function is not integrable on [0,1].
Moreover, I find that I don't know how to deal with the integration with |f(x)| instead. for example, I cannot find a way to integrate [tex]\int{\frac{1}{x^2} |sin(\frac{1}{x})|} dx[/tex] (can it be solved?)
Perhaps the function I need may have a totally different form...
Any hint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are going to have to show |f(x)| isn't integrable by splitting the integral up into regions where is positive or negative. What's the integral from 1/((n+1)*pi) to 1/(n*pi)? It's exactly like your series.
 
Umm...I don't see how to use the integral from 1/((n+1)*pi) to 1/(n*pi)..it seems that it is not sufficient to show the integration converges(in any case) nor diverges(in this particular one).
But I have made some progress under your hints, but still have problems unsolved.
for some reason, I tried [tex]\int^{1}_{0} \frac{1}{x} sin(\frac{1}{x}) dx[/tex] instead.
by taking t=1/x,
[tex]\int^{1}_{0} \frac{1}{x} sin(\frac{1}{x}) dx= \int^{\infty}_{1} \frac{sin t}{t} dt[/tex].
I have proved that [tex]\int^{c}_{1} \frac{sin t}{t} dt[/tex] diverges as c goes to infinity as follows.
[tex]\int^{2n\pi}_{n\pi} \frac{|sin t|}{t} dt >= \int^{2n\pi}_{n\pi} \frac{|sin t|}{2n\pi} dt=\frac{1}{2n\pi} \int^{2n\pi}_{n\pi} |sin t|dt>=\frac{n}{2n\pi}\int^{\pi}_{0} sin t dt= \frac{1}{\pi}[/tex]
But I still have trouble to prove that [tex]\int^{\infty}_{1} \frac{sin t}{t} dt[/tex] exists.
How can I start with it?
Thanks for your patience!
 
Your original idea about the series is good. Why don't you try defining the function piecewise to make it work exactly as you stated it? For example, define f(x)=(n+1)*(-1)^n for x in (1/(n+1),1/n]. What's the contribution from the nth interval?
 
yea...I agree that your function is more good-looking...
since I see there's a hope to define the sin(1/x)-like function that works, I just stick to it...I don't know why...
BTW, I have proved that [tex]\int^{c}_{1} \frac{sin t}{t} dt[/tex]converges, as c goes to infinity...though the proof is not a brilliant one in my opinion. I sketch it below (you may check):
Let [tex]A_{i}=\int^{\pi (i+1)}_{\pi i} \frac{sin t}{t} dt[/tex] then [tex]\sum A_{i}[/tex] converges (to B).
For every epsilon>0, there's an N such that n>N implies that
[tex]B-\epsilon<\sum^{n}_{1} A_{i}<B+\epsilon.[/tex]
For any c>(N+1)*pi. there's a n>N such that n*pi<=c<(n+1)*pi. Hence [tex]\int^{c}_{\pi} \frac{sin t}{t} dt[/tex] lies in between [tex]\sum^{n}_{1}A_i[/tex](call it X) and [tex]\sum^{n+1}_{1} A_i[/tex] (call it X2), whether X>X2 or not is depending on sin c>0 or sin c<0.
if X<X2, then
[tex]B-\epsilon<\sum^{n}_{1} A_{i}<\int^{c}_{\pi} \frac{sin t}{t} dt<\sum^{n+1}_{1} A_{i}<B+\epsilon.[/tex]
if X>X2, blah blah blah..
Hence, blah blah blah...
 
I don't exactly follow the proof. But it has some of the right ingredients in it. You want to show that the integrals of sin(t)/t make a decreasing alternating series. That's enough to show it converges. Then you want to make an estimate to show that the magnitude of the contribution from the nth cycle is greater than k/n for some k.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K