Finding refractive index of liquid with no parallax principle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the method of determining the refractive index of water using the no parallax principle. Participants described an experiment involving a submerged metal pin, a mirror, and a clamped pin to measure apparent and real depths. The key to this method lies in aligning the reflection of the clamped pin with the submerged pin while ensuring no parallax occurs, indicating that the apparent depth can be calculated using Snell's law and basic trigonometry. Understanding the behavior of light rays as they transition between air and water is essential for grasping this principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Snell's Law for refraction
  • Basic trigonometry for calculating angles and distances
  • Familiarity with the concept of apparent depth in optics
  • Knowledge of light behavior at the air/water interface
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Snell's Law and its applications in optics
  • Learn about the concept of apparent depth and its significance in optical experiments
  • Explore the principles of light refraction at different mediums
  • Investigate practical experiments to measure refractive indices of various liquids
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching optics, and anyone interested in experimental methods for measuring refractive indices.

MadmanMurray
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
In physics class we did an experiment where we dropped a metal pin in a beaker of water, covered half the beaker with a mirror and clamped another metal pin above the beaker. We had to find the refractive index of the water by measuring the apparent depth of the submerged pin and dividing it into the real depth of the pin.

The teacher told us we can find out the apparent depth by adjusting the height of the clamped pin so that when looking down the beaker we should be able to see the reflection (in the mirror) of the clamped pin aligned with the visible submerged pin and if we move our heads from side to side there should be no parallax.

It was dead simple to get the right results but I have absolutely no idea how it worked. I know that light rays travel through water faster than they do air and that the light rays deflect a little when they enter the water but I have no idea how this principle can be used to measure the apparent depth of a submerged object. The teacher didn't explain it at all so I don't think we have to know this but I'd really like to know. I've been pondering it trying to come up with an explanation but I can't think of a theory that makes sense.

I should mention that the apparent image was measured as the distance from the clamped pin to the mirror/top of beaker and obviously the real depth was the distance from the submerged pin to the mirror. How come when you adjust the height of the pin on the clamp to the right height above the beaker its reflection in the mirror can be aligned with the visible pin with no parallax. If you raise the pin a little there will be parallax though. Can anyone explain this to me?
 
Science news on Phys.org
MadmanMurray said:
It was dead simple to get the right results but I have absolutely no idea how it worked. I know that light rays travel through water faster than they do air and that the light rays deflect a little when they enter the water but I have no idea how this principle can be used to measure the apparent depth of a submerged object. The teacher didn't explain it at all so I don't think we have to know this but I'd really like to know. I've been pondering it trying to come up with an explanation but I can't think of a theory that makes sense.
Imagine that the submerged pin is a source of light (reflected light, but that doesn't matter). Treating the pin as a point source, draw a diagram showing light "rays" emanating in all directions, being refracted at the air/water interface. By "tracing back" the light rays in air, you can see the apparent position of the pin. Use Snell's law--and a bit of trig--to calculate the apparent depth for rays close to normal incidence.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K