Finding Self Isomorphisms in Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter scorpius1782
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism Self
scorpius1782
Messages
107
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm given a graph and am told to find non-trivial self isomorphisms. Non-trivial meaning that at least 1 node is "not mapped onto itself."

I've tried looking for self isomorphism but I can't find anything. I can tell when two graphs are isomorphic through inspection but "self-isomorphism" doesn't make any sense to me. Does this mean I'm suppose to split the graph and find a two that are isomorphic? So cut a whole bunch of edges and see if I can make two isomorphic graphs??

I'm just looking for clarity.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scorpius1782 said:

Homework Statement


I'm given a graph and am told to find non-trivial self isomorphisms. Non-trivial meaning that at least 1 node is "not mapped onto itself."

I've tried looking for self isomorphism but I can't find anything. I can tell when two graphs are isomorphic through inspection but "self-isomorphism" doesn't make any sense to me. Does this mean I'm suppose to split the graph and find a two that are isomorphic? So cut a whole bunch of edges and see if I can make two isomorphic graphs??

I'm just looking for clarity.

Thanks.

I believe a trivial isomorphism ##\phi## of a graph ##G## to another graph ##H## is an automorphism. For example, consider the identity map, which maps every node and edge onto itself (so really the graph wouldn't change at all, i.e ##G = H##).

I think a non-trivial isomorphism would map the vertices in ##G## onto ##H##, preserving edge structure, but not necessarily the shape of the graph.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
automorphism- Word I was looking for I guess. I'll be reading up on this. Thank you.
 
Edit: All wrong, figured it out with help from TA.
 

Attachments

  • graph.jpg
    graph.jpg
    8.6 KB · Views: 465
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top