Finding Separable Solutions for a Second-Order Partial Differential Equation

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I don't really understand separation of variables very well, and I was hoping to do get my mind more clear on the following question:

(Q) Use separation of variables to find all the separable solutions of the equation:

d²y/dt² -c²(d²y/dx²) + w²y = 0

where 'w' and c are constants.




The Attempt at a Solution



I first started by saying the solution to this equation can be written as:

y = X(x)T(t)

so: X(d²T/dt²) - c²(d²X/dx²)T + w²XT

divide through by XT we get:

(1/T)d²T/dt² -(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) + w² = 0

What would be the next step? How can I find a solution from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
now you just have two independent DEQs to solve

(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = 0

(1/T)d²T/dt² + w² = 0
 
waht said:
now you just have two independent DEQs to solve

(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = 0

(1/T)d²T/dt² + w² = 0


Shouldn't it be -(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = 0 ?

and shouldn't it be equated to a constant?

How would I go around to get a solution for these equations anyways?
 
yea never mind, you should equate them to some constant

(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = k

(1/T)d²T/dt² + w² = k
 
Put one variable on one side and the other variable on the other side. For them to be equal they both need to be equal to the same constant! It is not some kind of lame trick to just equate them to a constant. Convince yourself that they must be equal to a constant.
 
Cyosis said:
Put one variable on one side and the other variable on the other side. For them to be equal they both need to be equal to the same constant! It is not some kind of lame trick to just equate them to a constant. Convince yourself that they must be equal to a constant.

Oh ok. So now that I have both equated to the same constant, Do I just integrate both to get a solution or is there a general solution I can deduce from this?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top