Finding speed of the car, kinematics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a radio-controlled car that falls off a dock, with the goal of determining its speed at the moment it leaves the edge. The user calculated the car's horizontal speed (Vx) to be approximately 3.38 m/s after analyzing its displacement and time. While the calculations were confirmed as correct by other participants, one noted that the vertical speed (Vy) was unnecessary for solving the problem. Additionally, there was a suggestion to round off numbers for simplicity in future calculations. The user expressed relief at receiving validation for their work, indicating the stress of uncertainty in problem-solving.
jehan4141
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
This is an even numbered problem from Cutnell and Johnson 8 edition...Can somebody tell me if the answer is correct? I spent a good 30 minutes dissecting the problem, so here's to hoping I am right :)

A child operating a radio-controlled model car on a dock accidentally steers it off the edge. The car's displacement 1.1 s after leaving the dock has a magnitude of 7.0 m. What is the car's speed at the instant it drives off the edge of the dock?


Given
t = 1.1 s
Voy = 0 m/s
The displacement after 1.1 seconds is 7 meters. This means, from the point where it fell off the edge of the dock, to its position after 1.1 seconds, the distance between the two points is 7 meters.

We are trying to find Vox which is the same thing as Vx because there's no acceleration in the x-direction.

My Work
Voy = 0 m/s

Find Vy when t = 1.1 seconds passes

Vy = Voy + at = 0 - (-9.8*1.1)
Vy = -10.78 m/s

Find the distance it has fallen in the y-direction during the 1.1 seconds.
y = Voyt + 0.5at2 = 0.5(-9.8)(1.12)
y = -5.929 meters

Using A2 + B2 = C2
5.9292 + B2 = 72
B = 3.72114 meters <----this is the distance in the x direction that it travels during 1.1 seconds

So Vx = B/t = 3.72114/1.1
Vx = 3.383 m/s

PRETTY PLEASE LET THIS BE CORRECT *fingers crossed*
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Jehan,

your work is correct and nice, but why have you calculated vy? It was not needed.

ehild
 
Hi!
It seems like the reasoning and execution is flawless, good job!
One point though, just for future reference: there's a lot to be said for rounding off, on occasion.
You have your v_y there, at 5.92... It's not unreasonable to bring to ~6...
Daniel
 
thank you both! it feels so stressful not knowing whether it is right or wrong. having both your approval puts me at ease! i can finally get some sleep! thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top