Finding spring constant and maximum acceleration

AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of the bungee jumper, start by identifying the forces acting on her: gravity and the restoring force of the bungee cord, which behaves like a Hookean spring. Initially, the jumper experiences free fall for the first 12 meters, where only gravitational force is acting. As she descends further, the bungee cord's restoring force increases, counteracting gravity until equilibrium is reached. To find the spring constant, use Hooke's Law, and for maximum acceleration, apply Newton's second law (F=ma) considering the net forces at play. Understanding the dynamics of these forces is crucial to calculating both the spring constant and maximum acceleration.
chase222
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
A 60 kg bungee jumper jumps from a bridge. She is tied to a 12 m long bungee cord and falls a total of 31 m. Calculate the spring constant of the bungee cord and the maximum acceleration experienced by the jumper.

I don't even know where to start. Can you tell me which equations I would use to find the answers to both parts of the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find the formulas for the two forces involved, I suppose you can ignore friction which leaves you with how many forces? Then use Newtons F=ma to find the resulting acceleration, and note that the first 12m are a free fall...
 
No, I won't tell you which equations to use. Instead, let's try to actually understand the problem: As always, start off with a free body diagram! What forces act on the jumper? It's easy...in this case there are only two. Gravity, and the restoring force of the bungee cord (it acts like a Hookian spring). So, what happens as she falls? Initially, the restoring force is zero. So gravity accelerates her downward. But the farther down she goes, the stronger the restoring force trying to pull her back up becomes. What happens at equilibrium? I.e. how can you determine what's going on at the point at which she stops falling? That's the key to solving this problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top