Finding terminal voltage given two batteries

  • Thread starter Thread starter taylorivy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Batteries Voltage
AI Thread Summary
To find the terminal voltage in a circuit with two batteries, it's crucial to consider both the external resistance and the internal resistances of the batteries. The formula for terminal voltage is Terminal V = Emf - ir, where 'i' is the current calculated using Kirchhoff's laws. The initial confusion arose from not knowing the internal resistance, but recognizing that the circuit includes two batteries with their respective internal resistances clarified the problem. By factoring in these internal resistances, the terminal voltage can be accurately determined. Understanding the circuit's components is essential for solving such problems effectively.
taylorivy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://www.webassign.net/giancoli5/19_31alt.gif
I was given this circuit and told that R=6.6Ω. Based on the information, I was asked to find the terminal voltage.

Homework Equations


Terminal V=Emf-ir
Kirchoff's laws


The Attempt at a Solution


I used Kirchoff's laws to find i=.61 A. From there, I don't understand how to find terminal voltage without knowing internal resistance. I feel like I wasn't taught an equation or something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
taylorivy said:

Homework Statement


http://www.webassign.net/giancoli5/19_31alt.gif
I was given this circuit and told that R=6.6Ω. Based on the information, I was asked to find the terminal voltage.

Homework Equations


Terminal V=Emf-ir
Kirchoff's laws


The Attempt at a Solution


I used Kirchoff's laws to find i=.61 A. From there, I don't understand how to find terminal voltage without knowing internal resistance. I feel like I wasn't taught an equation or something.

It looks like your circuit shows two batteries each with an internal resistance. So what "terminal voltage" is being referred to?
 
Man, I realized that as soon as I looked at the diagram again. I factored in the two given resistances as the internal ones and it worked out perfectly. Thanks anyway!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top