Finding the 3 Axes of a Sakai Gyro

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icheb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axes Gyro
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the three main axes of moment of inertia for a Sakai gyro, emphasizing the importance of symmetry in determining these axes. Two axes have been identified: one vertical axis of rotation and one horizontal axis in the plane of the ring. The challenge lies in finding the third axis, which is suggested to be perpendicular to the other two, despite concerns about symmetry. Additionally, calculating the moment of inertia may require using discrete integrals, and it's noted that not all shapes have three axes of symmetry. A resource is provided for further reading on the topic.
Icheb
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I have a Sakai gyro that looks like this:
http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/4556/sakainn4.gif

Now I have to find the three main axes of the moment of inertia by considering symmetries.

I put the two axes into the picture which I think I know. The first one would be the upright because it is rotating around that axis.
The second one would be the one in the plane of the ring because one half of the ring is symmetrical to other half.
But where would the third axis lie? I can't seem to find another symmetry. At first I just thought it's at a 90° angle to my second axis, but one half wouldn't be symmetrical to the other half.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow, that doesn't seem like an Introductory Physics question past the first axis. Would you like me to move it to the Advanced Physics homework forum?

And past that, it looks like you need to use a discrete integral to calculate the moment if inertia of that figure in the other axes. What are the integral equations that you would start with?
 
You cannot always have three axes of symmetry. In fact you cannot always have two or even one. You have picked two reasonable axes based on the symmetries you have identified. Take the third on to be perpendicular to the other two. It is probably giving you too much information, but a google search on the Sakai top brings up a rather nice paper on the subject

http://www.e20.physik.tu-muenchen.de/~cucke/ftp/lectures/SAKAIEN.PDF
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top