Finding the Alternate Form of a Square Root: A Mathematical Challenge

AI Thread Summary
To find an alternate form of sqrt(3+sqrt(8), the key is to simplify it step-by-step. Starting with sqrt(3+2sqrt(2), you can rewrite it as sqrt(1+2+2sqrt(2)). By factoring, this expression can be transformed into sqrt((1+sqrt(2))(1+sqrt(2))), leading to the final result of 1+sqrt(2). The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing patterns and factoring in simplifying square roots. Overall, the process illustrates a method for tackling similar mathematical simplifications.
Rat3dR
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey there,

Square roots never have been my strongest point in maths, but I'm not seeing the trick in this example:

I'm trying to find an alternate form of:
sqrt(3+sqrt(8))
I get as far as:
sqrt(3+2 sqrt(2))

But i know i want to/should end up with:
1+sqrt(2)

I just don't know how to get there... :(

Any help?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try squaring both expressions. Then they become equal, no?
 
Maybe i should explain my question a little further..

In my calculations I end up with the first (or second) expression (namely sqrt(3+sqrt(8))).. Which is fine, since it's the right answer, however, for convenience I tried to find an alternate, simpler expression, which should be 1+sqrt(2). I found it using Mathematica, but I have NO idea how I'd go from the first expression to the last one.. What are the intermediate steps?

EDIT: I played around a bit, using your useful input, and i think I'm getting the hang of it.. Any advice on how to tackle these kind of simplifications in general would still be great though :)
 
Last edited:
Rat3dR said:
I'm trying to find an alternate form of:
sqrt(3+sqrt(8))
I get as far as:
sqrt(3+2 sqrt(2))

But i know i want to/should end up with:
1+sqrt(2)

Try sqrt(3+sqrt(8)) --> sqrt(3+2 sqrt(2)) --> sqrt(1+2+2 sqrt(2)) --> (factorise)--> sqrt( (1+sqrt(2))(1+sqrt(2)) ) --> 1+sqrt(2)
 
Yes, thank you all for your help :). I just needed this little bump to get things going. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top