Finding the area of a triangle on a graph

AI Thread Summary
To find the area of a triangle on a graph, the formula used is (base x height)/2. The confusion arises from determining the correct base and height based on the triangle's vertices. The base is identified as segment PR, which does not equal 7, and the height is determined from point PQ. The calculated area should reflect these dimensions accurately, leading to discrepancies with the mark scheme's answer. Clarification on the correct interpretation of the triangle's dimensions is essential for accurate area calculation.
Count Duckula
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Here is the question: http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/hh299/the-real-guitar-hero/Capture_zpsf2b9cd28.png

part A = 3√5
b=y=2X+1
c=(0,1)
D is where I am confused. Area of triangle = (base x height)/2
from working out, line 2 cuts the x-axis at -1/2. line 1 cuts the x at 7. the height is 3. thus the area should be [(7.5*3)/2] = 11.25 . but the mark scheme says the answer is 7.5? which is length of the base! but the heck?This is just one of those small things that has confused the hell out of me >.<
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The base of the triangle is PR, which does not have length 7 because P is not on the x-axis!
Similarly, the height of the triangle is PQ.
 
Ugh. ok, so its, 3√5 * √5
 
Almost :)

Count Duckula said:
Area of triangle = (base x height)/2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top