Finding the Capacity of a Jug Using Basic Algebra

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a keg of wine and a jug, where the keg is filled with water after drawing off wine. The goal is to determine the capacity of the jug based on the condition that after mixing, the keg contains equal quantities of wine and water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the representation of quantities in equations, questioning the validity of assumptions regarding the mixture of wine and water. There are attempts to reformulate the problem and equations based on the mixing process and the resulting concentrations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, revising their approaches based on feedback. Some have suggested new equations and reasoning, while others have pointed out potential flaws in the assumptions made about the mixing process. The discussion is ongoing with no clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on understanding the concept of concentration versus quantity in the context of the problem. Participants are also navigating the implications of the keg's initial conditions and the effects of removing and replacing liquid.

hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man had a ten gallon keg of wine and a jug. One day, he drew off a jug full of wine and filled up the keg with water. Later on, when the wine and the water had got thoroughly mixed, he drew off another jugful and again filled up the keg with water. The keg then contained equal quantities of water and wine. What was the capacity of the Jug ?


Homework Equations



Algebra

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what I think should be the correct solution :
Let x be the capacity of the jug
10-2x = 2x
∴x= 2.5 Gallons

Am I correct ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's impossible to know if what you are doing makes sense (whether or not "2.5 gallons" is correct) because you have not said what you are doing. What do "10- 2x" and "2x" represent? If you intend "10- 2x" to represent the the amount of wine in the keg you are wrong because the second jug drawn off is NOT all wine.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It's impossible to know if what you are doing makes sense (whether or not "2.5 gallons" is correct) because you have not said what you are doing. What do "10- 2x" and "2x" represent? If you intend "10- 2x" to represent the the amount of wine in the keg you are wrong because the second jug drawn off is NOT all wine.

Hmm... I hadn't thought of that.

In that case, I would amend my method to :

10 - x/2 - x = x - x/2 +x

Left side : we removed x gallons of pure wine from the keg, and then afterwards we took another jug full of WINE and WATER (mixed in equal proportions since the question explicitly states "thoroughly mixed")

Right side of the equation : we added x gallons of pure water to the keg, then were forced to remove x/2 water from the keg (unintentionally) and later added x gallons of pure water

The answer comes out to be 5 gallons .

Is it correct now ?
 
Last edited:
hms.tech said:
Hmm... I hadn't thought of that.

In that case, I would amend my method to :

10 - x/2 - x = x - x/2 +x

Left side : we removed x gallons of pure wine from the keg, and then afterwards we took another jug full of WINE and WATER (mixed in equal proportions since the question explicitly states "thoroughly mixed")
No, "thoroughly mixed" does NOT mean "equal proportions" unless your jug happened to be exactly 1/2 the size of the keg- since you are assuming that, it should be no surprise that you get "5 gallons", half the size of the keg! For example, if the size of the jug were 1 gallon, you would have removed one gallon of wine so that the keg has 9 gallons of wine left. Adding one gallon of water, you now have 9 gallons of wine and 1 gallon of water so that, after "thoroughly mixing" each gallon contains 9/10 gallon of wine and 1/10 gallon of water.

If the jug were really 5 gallons, after the first removal of wine and addition of water, you would have 5 gallons of wine and 5 gallons of water- "thoroughly mixing" each gallon would be half wine and half water. Removing 5 more gallons would remove 5/2= 2.5 gallons of wine leaving 2.5 gallons of wine. Replacing that with water would give 2.5 gallons of wine, 7.5 gallons of water, NOT "equal quantities".

You are told, rather, that after the second jug is removed, and replaced with water, you have "equal proportions" of wine and water.

Right side of the equation : we added x gallons of pure water to the keg, then were forced to remove x/2 water from the keg (unintentionally) and later added x gallons of pure water

The answer comes out to be 5 gallons .

Is it correct now ?
The keg initially contained 10 gal of wine. You remove x gallons and replace with water, you now have 10- x gallons of wine in the keg, x gallons of water. After "thoroughly mixing", each gallon in the keg contains (10- x)/10 gallons of wine, x/10 gallons of water.
The second jug, then, removes x(10- x)/10 gallons of wine, leaving (10-x)- x(10- x)/10= (100- 10x- 10x+ x^2)/10= (100- 20x+ x^2)/10 gallons of wine in the keg.

If the keg then "contains equal quantities of water and wine", that is, 5 gallons of wine and 5 gallons of water, we must have (100- 20x+ x^2)/10= 5. So 100- 20x+ x^2= 50 and then x^2- 20x= -50. Solve that equation for x.

That quadratic equation has two roots, only one of which is valid for this problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Got it . So the underlying concept was to prioritize "concentration" over quantity
 
I'm not sure I like the word "prioritize" here but, yes, you need to work with the concentration.

By the way, what answer did you get?
 
10-5(2)^0.5

≈2.9 gallons
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K