Finding the combined capacitance between A and B

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eitan Levy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the combined capacitance between points A and B in a circuit involving multiple capacitors. Participants are exploring the configuration of capacitors, specifically focusing on identifying which are in series and which are in parallel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the arrangement of capacitors, with some suggesting that certain capacitors can be ignored based on their connections. Questions arise about the relevance of charge and voltage in determining series versus parallel connections.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the circuit configuration, with some participants offering guidance on identifying irrelevant components and suggesting redrawing the circuit for clarity. Multiple interpretations of the connections are being considered, but no consensus has been reached on the final configuration.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the connections of capacitors and the implications of charge distribution, indicating a need for clarification on the principles of series and parallel configurations. The discussion also highlights the challenge of visualizing the circuit due to extraneous components.

Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
Find the combined capacitance between A and B
Relevant Equations
Parallel and series connection of capactiors
First of all I believe that capacitors 1, 2 and 3 are connected in series, because the charge on them must be equal so I combined them.

After that, I suspect that the result of their combined capacitor (C123) is connected in parallel to C4 because the voltages on them are the same.

After that I struggle to find capacitors that will have the same charge or voltage on them due to the many wires that don't connect to anything.

I can't even understand how the capacitors on the edges may be charged, how can charge move from the plate closer to the edge? It should remain constant.

How do I proceed?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    7.7 KB · Views: 173
Physics news on Phys.org
Eitan Levy said:
believe that capacitors 1, 2 and 3 are connected in series
From the perspective of A? 1 is down the left path, while 2 and 3 are down the right path.
Eitan Levy said:
because the charge on them must be equal
I don’t see why that would be, or what the relevance of it would be to whether they are in series.
 
For start, I believe capacitors 5, 6 and 8 are irrelevant and can be removed from the schematic without affecting the total capacitance between A and B.
After that I believe you can identify more easily which capacitors are in series and which in parallel.
 
haruspex said:
From the perspective of A? 1 is down the left path, while 2 and 3 are down the right path.

I don’t see why that would be, or what the relevance of it would be to whether they are in series.
Then how do J determine when are capacitors connected by series or by parallel? That pretty much was what I was taught in class.

I I understand my mistake with 1 2 and 3. 2 and 3 are still connected by series I believe, but how can I proceed from there?
 
I
Delta2 said:
For start, I believe capacitors 5, 6 and 8 are irrelevant and can be removed from the schematic without affecting the total capacitance between A and B.
After that I believe you can identify more easily which capacitors are in series and which in parallel.
Is it okay to ignore them? Is it because they can't be charged due to the way the diagram was constructed?
 
Eitan Levy said:
I

Is it okay to ignore them? Is it because they can't be charged due to the way the diagram was constructed?
yes I believe it is okay to ignore them. They can't be charged as you say, because if we imagine current flowing from A to B via all possible paths, these possible paths do not include capacitors 5 , 6 and 8.
 
Yes, as @Delta2 said, capacitors (or components in general) that are just "hanging" from circuit nodes without connections to other components at their other ends can be ignored. They will play no part in the operation of the circuit. Note that nodes A and B are considered to be important to the circuit operation since you would "connect" a hypothetical capacitance meter between them. So capacitor 9 is not just "dangling" without connection. It must remain.

Removing the extraneous capacitors you should be able to identify the remaining capacitors that are in either series or parallel, and hence reduce the circuit accordingly. Try redrawing the circuit without the unnecessary components and see what you can do to reduce the circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Delta2 said:
yes I believe it is okay to ignore them. They can't be charged as you say, because if we imagine current flowing from A to B via all possible paths, these possible paths do not include capacitors 5 , 6 and 8.
So I get C2 and C3 connected in series, C23 is connected in parallel to C14 where C1 and C4 are also connected in series. After that C1234,C7,C9 are all connected in series. Is that right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Eitan Levy said:
So I get C2 and C3 connected in series, C23 is connected in parallel to C14 where C1 and C4 are also connected in series. After that C1234,C7,C9 are all connected in series. Is that right?
Looks good! So,... now do the math...
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K