MHB Finding the Distance Between Buoys: A Cruise Ship Balcony Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdrama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ship
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the distance between two buoys observed from a cruise ship balcony 25m above sea level. The first buoy is directly east at a 32° angle of depression, while the second buoy is 65° south of east at a 40° angle of depression. The Law of Sines and the Law of Cosines are recommended for finding the distances to each buoy and the distance between them. It's emphasized that using exact values in calculations until the final step is crucial to avoid compounding rounding errors. The final calculated distance between the buoys is approximately 38.48 meters.
mathdrama
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Not really sure how to do this problem. I'm not even sure where the angles are.

5. The balcony of a cruise ship is 25m above sea level. A person standing on the balcony sees two buoy’s in the water below. The first buoy is situated directly east of her at an angle of depression of 32°. The second buoy is situated 65° south of east at an angle of depression of 40°. Find the distance (x) between the two buoys (B1 and B2) .
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by drawing a sketch:

View attachment 2514

Now, you can use the Law of Sines to find $d_1$ and $d_2$, and then the Law of Cosines to find $d$, the distance between the buoys.

edit: You could also consider using the tangent function to find $d_1$ and $d_2$.
 

Attachments

  • buoys.jpg
    buoys.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 106
MarkFL said:
I would begin by drawing a sketch:

View attachment 2514

Now, you can use the Law of Sines to find $d_1$ and $d_2$, and then the Law of Cosines to find $d$, the distance between the buoys.

edit: You could also consider using the tangent function to find $d_1$ and $d_2$.

Are attachments acceptable or would LaTex still be more convenient?

Could you kindly help me check my work?
 

Attachments

Posting your work here rather than attaching it is much more convenient for those looking at your work.

One issue I have with what you have done, and it is certainly something I have seen many students do, is using rounded values in your computations. It is better to use exact values until the very end, and only then use a decimal approximation is so desired. Errors from rounding can become compounded if used in intermediary steps.

This is how I would work the problem:

$$d_1=25\cot\left(32^{\circ}\right)$$

$$d_2=25\cot\left(40^{\circ}\right)$$

Now use the Law of Cosines:

$$d^2=25^2\cot^2\left(32^{\circ}\right)+25^2\cot^2\left(40^{\circ}\right)-2\cdot25^2\cot\left(32^{\circ}\right)\cot\left(40^{\circ}\right)\cos\left(65^{\circ}\right)$$

$$d=25\sqrt{\cot^2\left(32^{\circ}\right)+\cot^2\left(40^{\circ}\right)-2\cot\left(32^{\circ}\right)\cot\left(40^{\circ}\right)\cos\left(65^{\circ}\right)}\approx38.4813948\text{ m}$$

You see, using rounded values caused you to round up when the true value should be rounded down. Other than this issue though, your method was correct.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top