Finding the distance to an Asteroid

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimensionless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid
AI Thread Summary
Astronomers determine an asteroid's distance from the sun by assessing its intrinsic brightness, which requires multiple observations to refine its orbit and position. Initial observations record key parameters such as time, elevation, azimuth, range, and range rate, with the latter two often measured by bouncing signals off the asteroid. If direct measurements aren't possible, estimates based on brightness and other factors are used. The accuracy of these measurements improves over time as more data is collected, allowing for a clearer trajectory to be plotted. This process explains why early warnings about potential asteroid impacts can later be retracted as trajectories are refined.
dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
When astronomers find an asteroid, how do they determine its distance from the sun? And for that matter, how do they determine its absolute velocity.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's tricky one. They have to know its intrinsic brightness in order to know its distance. They guess, based on known bodies.

After more observation, they can determine its proper motion, which will help in determining its orbit, which will help in determining its position/distance.

All these factors work together to narrow down the range as they receive more data.

But, as one will note, in the study of planet 10 (I can't bring myself to call it Xena), they don't know its size very well at all, since they have no yardstick to measure its brightness. They also haven't had very long to determine its orbit accurately (which is > 250 years long).
 
You take several observations.

Specifically, each observation has to record the time, elevation, azimuth, range, and range rate. The range and range rate could be found by bouncing a signal off of the object. The time it takes the signal to return tells you how far away the object is. The Doppler shift in frequency tells you how fast the object is approaching or departing. If you can't bounce a signal off the object, you have to estimate the range and range rate by other means (brightness, etc).

Since the object is unlikely to have moved very far in one night from the observer's perspective, it's hard to make 'several' observations very quickly and the accuracy of the range and range rate usually aren't very good on the first observations. This is why you periodically get a warning of an asteroid that may hit the Earth at some date in the future.

The initial observations are just to give other astronomer's the objects location. Eventually, you have enough observations to plot a trajectory through the sky. Having lots of observations and plotting them out is the only accurate way to determine the object's distance and velocity (just like calculating a lot of answers for various values of x eventually gives you a curve or line that defines an equation).

It's also why eventually the warning about the asteroid that may hit the Earth is discovered to be a false alarm. A wide swath of possible trajectories is eventually narrowed down to the object's actual trajectory.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top