Finding the Equilibrium Position for Three Charges

AI Thread Summary
To find the equilibrium position for the third charge, the net electrostatic force on it must be zero, which occurs when the forces from the other two charges balance. The initial setup involves two positive charges, with the third charge needing to be positioned between them. The user attempted to set up the equation using Coulomb's law but encountered difficulties with cross-multiplication and solving for the distance. Clarification was provided that a quadratic equation should be formed after correctly cross-multiplying both sides. The discussion emphasizes the need to accurately manipulate the equation to find the correct position for the third charge.
Fireupchip
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge of 2.21E-9 C is placed at the origin, and a charge of 3.78E-9 C is placed at x = 1.60 m. Find the position at which a third charge of 2.94E-9 C can be placed so that the net electrostatic force on it is zero.

Homework Equations


Coloumb's law

The Attempt at a Solution



All 3 charges are positive, so for the net force to be zero, I believe that the 3rd charge will go in the middle of the other 2 charges.

+q1 |----1.60m - r -----| +q3 |------ r------| +q2

Knowns:
q1 = 2.21 x 10^-9 C
q2 = 3.78 x 10^-9 C
q3 = 2.94 x 10^-9 C
r (between q1 and q2) = 1.60 m

F1 = F2

the k and q3 both cancel, leaving me with:

q1 / (1.60m - r)^2 = q2 / r^2

I cross multiplied, giving me:

q1 / q2 = (1.60m - r)^2 / r^2

This is where I think I'm having a problem. From this point, I found 2 different answers, and both turned out to be wrong: 0.91m and 1.05m (both from q1). Can anyone please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't completely "cross multiply" (and I dislike that term). You did multiply on both sides by the denominator on the left, (160- r)^2. Now multiply on both sides by the denominator on the right to get (q1/q2)r^2= (160- r)^2. Multiply out the square on the right and you a quadratic equation to solve for r.
 
So if I multiply the square out on the right, there'll still be an r on the left side.
 
My physics professor said to avoid using the quadratic equation in this situation. Where am I going wrong?
 
Anyone?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top