Finding the height of a well after a stone is dropped

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamjohnny56
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height
AI Thread Summary
To determine the depth of the well, the problem must be analyzed in two parts: the stone's fall and the sound's travel time. The stone is dropped with an initial velocity of zero, and its distance can be calculated using the equation for free fall. The sound travels at a constant speed of 316 m/s after the stone hits the water. By relating the time taken for both the stone to fall and the sound to travel back to the man, the equations can be combined to solve for the well's height. Properly separating and analyzing these components is crucial for finding the correct answer.
iamjohnny56
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man drops a stone into a water well on his farm. He hears the sound of the splash 3.18 s later.
How deep is the well? The acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s^2 and the speed of sound in air is 316 m/s.
Answer in units of m.

Homework Equations



x - x0 = v0t + (1/2)at2

The Attempt at a Solution



x - x0 = 316 m/s + (1/2)(-9.8 m/s^2)(3.18 s)2
x - x0 = 955.32924 m

--------

I think I'm doing this correctly...but it's coming out as wrong. I think it's because I'm assuming the speed of sound given (316 m/s) is the initial velocity; but isn't that correct?

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the stone a sound wave? Does it fly out of the farmer's hand at the speed of sound?
 
Nope, it is not correct to use the speed of sound as the initial speed of the stone.

You should probably analyze the two parts of this problem separately at first. One part is where the stone drops (hint: model distance dropped as a function of time using zero initial speed and distance) and another part where you find how distance traveled by a sound wave relates to time.

Once you have the equations for the two parts, ask yourself how these relate to each other in the combined problem (hint: a variable in the two parts are equal) and see if you can bring the equations to a form where you can solve for height of the well.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top