Finding the integral of t e^(-lambda t) from t=0 to t=infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
10 replies · 10K views
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5
[tex]\int_{0}^{infty} t e^{-\lambda t} \lambda dt[/tex][tex]\frac{1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} (1 + t \lambda) \right]_{0}^{\infty} = \frac{1}{\lambda}[/tex]

is this corect??

for hte infinity part we don't have to worry since the 1/exponential term goes to zero as does the t/exponential term. For t = 0 however t/exponentail is zero and what is left is 1/lambda
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're missing a factor of lambda. It's helpful if you think of t as being a time, so that lambda is a frequency and the integral needs to have dimensions of time^2.
 
StatusX said:
You're missing a factor of lambda. It's helpful if you think of t as being a time, so that lambda is a frequency and the integral needs to have dimensions of time^2.
how am i missing it??

did i not do everything right??

see the whole work

[tex]\frac{-1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} (1 + t \lambda) \right]_{0}^{\infty} = \lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \left(\frac{-1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} \right) - \left( \frac{-1}{\lambda}\right) - 0 \right) = \frac{1}{\lambda}[/tex]

where does the extra fact oro lambda come from??
 
Last edited:
The problem is before the first step you've shown, since the dimensions are wrong there as well. How did you take the antiderivative?
 
are u talkin about hte negative sign i was missing??

i did integration by parts..
 
since we are on this what about
[tex]\int_{T}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda t} \lambda dt = -e^{-\lambda t} |_{T}^{\infty} = 0 + e^{-\lambda T}[/tex]

am i missing a fact or of lambda here too.. WHY??
 
Last edited:
StatusX said:
No, you're missing a factor of lambda in the antiderivative. Go back through it step through step.

i typed out the question wrong...

it should be e^\lambda t * lambda
 
I'm confused. Your antiderivative in the first step is right except for a factor of lambda. If you meant for there not to be a t multiplying the exponential, then your original answer is completely wrong. So which is it?
 
Ok let's restart

[tex]\int_{0}^{\infty} t e^{-\lambda t} \lambda dt[/tex]

and the integral is
[tex]\frac{-1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} (1 + t \lambda) \right]_{0}^{\infty} = \frac{1}{\lambda}[/tex]

good?