Finding the Landing Path of an Airplane Using Cubic Polynomial Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter wisredz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane Path
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the landing path of an airplane modeled by a cubic polynomial function, specifically y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d. Key points include finding the derivatives dy/dx at x=0 and x=-L, with the understanding that dy/dx at x=0 equals c and dy/dx at x=-L equals zero. Participants clarify that at both endpoints, the slope is flat, leading to the conclusion that c must be zero, simplifying the equation to y=ax^3+bx^2. The values of a and b can then be derived from the conditions y(0)=0 and y(-L)=H. The conversation highlights the process of solving the polynomial function for the airplane's descent path, ultimately providing clarity and resolution to the original question.
wisredz
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
Hi I have this question that is driving me mad any help is appreciated.

An airplane is flying at altitude H when it begins its decent to an airport runway that is at horizontal ground distance L from the airplane. Assume that the landing path of the airplane is the graph of a cubic polynomial fuction y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+dwhere y(-L)=H and y(0)=0.

(a) What is dy/dx at x=0?
(b) What is dy/dx at x= -L?
(c) Use the values for dy/dx at x=0 and x= -L together with y(0)=0 and y(-L)=H to show that

y(x)=H[2(x/L)^3+3(x/L)^2]

Anyhelp is appreciated. Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Btw, that dy/dx at x=0 equals c and that dy/dx at -L equals 0 is clear to me. My problem is that I cannot use those informations...
 
now at the top and bottom it is flat so dy/dx at x=0 and x=-L should be zero,
 
oh u posted again,
y= ax^3+bx^2+cx
on Solving u will have c=0
Therefore
y= ax^3+bx^2
u can get values of a and b from
dy/dx at x= -L, is zero
and also y(-L) = H
 
God, it is that easy then... It was 2 in the morning here(Turkey) Thanks a lot, I was going out of my mind.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top