Finding the Laurent Series of e^(1/(1-z)) for Residue Calculation

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27

Homework Statement


Hi! I need to find the laurent series of ##e^{1/(1-z)}## to get the residue at ##z=1##. Can somebody help me?

The Attempt at a Solution



https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/q71/s720x720/1461607_10201796752217165_1002449331_n.jpg

I tried using the taylor series of e^x around x=1, but I seem to have failed.. what am I to do? I can't use the maclaurin series of e^x, right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nikitin said:

Homework Statement


Hi! I need to find the laurent series of ##e^{1/(1-z)}## to get the residue at ##z=1##. Can somebody help me?

The Attempt at a Solution



https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/q71/s720x720/1461607_10201796752217165_1002449331_n.jpg

I tried using the taylor series of e^x around x=1, but I seem to have failed.. what am I to do? I can't use the maclaurin series of e^x, right?

You can and should. e^x = \displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{x^n}{n!} is a definition of e^x. Setting x = (1 - z)^{-1} is clearly going to give you a sum of powers of (z - 1), which is after all what you want.
 
But why can you do that? Shouldn't the taylor series used to find the laurent series be expanded about the same value as the laurent series is being expanded about (in this case z=1)?

Could you remind me of the rules for stuff?
 
Last edited:
Nikitin said:
But why can you do that? Shouldn't the taylor series used to find the laurent series be expanded about the same value as the laurent series is being expanded about (in this case z=1)?

Why should it?

If the power series g(z) = \sum a_n z^n has radius of convergence R, then if |f(z)| < R we have g(f(z)) = \sum a_n f(z)^n.

If f(z) is not within the radius of convergence then one generally has to find a different power series for g. But that would point to expanding g in a Taylor series about f(z_0), not z_0 itself.

Conveniently the power series for exp, which is in fact the definition of the exp function on the complex plane, has infinite radius of convergence, so
<br /> \exp (f(z)) = \sum_{n= 0}^{\infty} \frac{f(z)^n}{n!}<br />
for any f(z).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hmm, indeed. But still, what happens if f(z) has multiple poles? How would you find the residues of them?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top