MHB Finding the Least Residue of 3^215 (mod 65537)

  • Thread starter Thread starter toni07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Residue
Click For Summary
To find the least residue of 3^215 (mod 65537), it is essential to recognize that 65537 is a Fermat's prime, specifically of the form F_n = 2^(2^n) + 1. Using Fermat's little theorem, it is established that 3^(F_n - 1)/2 = -1 (mod F_n), which translates to 3^(2^15) = -1 (mod 65537). The original query mistakenly referenced 3^215 instead of 3^(2^15), prompting clarification on the exponent. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly applying theorems related to Fermat's primes. The discussion highlights the importance of precise notation in modular arithmetic calculations.
toni07
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Compute the least residue of 3^215 (mod 65537) (65537 is prime).

I've tried to use Euler's theorem, Fermat's little theorem and Wilson's theorem, but nothing seems to work, please help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
crypt50 said:
Compute the least residue of 3^215 (mod 65537) (65537 is prime).

I've tried to use Euler's theorem, Fermat's little theorem and Wilson's theorem, but nothing seems to work, please help.

The number 65537 is not a 'whatever prime', it is a Fermat's prime because is in the form $\displaystyle F_{n}= 2^{2^{n}}+1$. For a Fermat's prime the following holds...

$\displaystyle 3^{\frac{F_{n}-1}{2}} = -1\ \text{mod}\ F_{n}\ (1)$

For n=4 the (1) becomes...

$\displaystyle 3^{2^{15}} = -1\ \text{mod}\ 65537\ (2)$

In your post is written $\displaystyle 3^{215}$ and not $\displaystyle 3^{2^{15}}$... the question is: are You sure to have written correctly?... Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Thanks, a lot I didn't realize it was 3^2^15. Thanks for calling my attention to it.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K