Finding the Limit of f(x) Near x=2

  • Thread starter Thread starter garyng2001hk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
garyng2001hk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find lim(x --> 2) f(x)


Homework Equations



Given lim(x-->2) ((f(x)-5)/x-2)) = 3
Find lim(x --> 2) f(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 5. but i dun know the formal steps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garyng2001hk said:
The answer is 5. but i dun know the formal steps.
How do you know the answer is 5? What are the informal steps?
 
If i subs x=2 into the denominator, the denominator goes to 0.
therefore, the numerator should equals 0 and x=5
 
I think you have the right idea...

Let's start with the first part:
If i subs x=2 into the denominator, the denominator goes to 0.
This is fine. But just so I can be sure you know what's going on -- why is it that you can evaluate \lim_{x \to 2} x-2 by substituting x with 2 in (x-2)?


therefore, the numerator should equals 0
Can you say why?

(This is the most important question in my entire post. If you answer only one, make it this one. But you should answer all of them)


and x=5
That's wrong. Did you mean f(x)=5? That's wrong too. Did you mean f(x) goes to 5? Then that would be right.

It may seem like I'm nitpicking here -- but the ability to write what you actually mean is incredibly important in mathematics.

If nothing else, once you can write what you mean, then any arithmetic needed to do a calculation usually becomes a lot more evident.

Anyways, can you argue why
\lim_{x \to 2} \left( f(x) - 5\right) = 0​
implies
\lim_{x \to 2} f(x) = 5​
?

I'm assuming you've had a few homework problems that ask you to do problems exactly like this -- so hopefully this argument has become second nature. If not, you should practice until it is second nature. :wink: I'll give a hint: you pretty much have only one theorem that relates limits and subtraction, so you should use it!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top