Finding the mass of a super-massive Black Hole?

AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of the super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way, the relationship T^2 = a^3 can be applied, where T is the orbital period and a is the semi-major axis. The observer notes that S2, a bright star, has a 15-year period and an orbit of 950 A.U. However, there is confusion regarding the correct application of formulas, particularly with notation consistency and the need to square the period in calculations. The Schwarzschild radius, which defines the event horizon, cannot be determined without first finding the mass. Clarifying these equations and ensuring proper notation will aid in solving the problem effectively.
MarcL
Messages
170
Reaction score
2
Hi, I am not too sure where to post this. I am studying for my astrophysics final and I came across this question which is pretty easy ( I think) but I can't seem to find the answer...

S2 is observed to be one of the brightest stars orbiting the black hole at the center of Milky Way. It has period of 15 years and orbit of 950 A.U.

a) Find the mass of the super-massive black hole
b)find its event horizon.

I can do b ( can't find the schwarzchild radius without the mass though). For a, I thought of using the relationship of T^2=a^3 to find my semi major axis to then find my mass with M=A^3/P however that didn't work. I'm not too sure what to use anymore.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This is a homework-type question. You should post it in the homework section.

MarcL said:
I can do b ( can't find the schwarzchild radius without the mass though). For a, I thought of using the relationship of T^2=a^3 to find my semi major axis to then find my mass with M=A^3/P however that didn't work. I'm not too sure what to use anymore.
Why do you want to use the first equation? Both variables are given in the question. The second equation is incorrect(period should be squared).

Additionally, you're using T in the first, and P in the second, a in the first and A in the second, where each pair means the same thing. It's good to be consistent in notation.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top