Finding the mass of stars that evolved away.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Toad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Stars
AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass of stars in the Pleiades cluster that have evolved into red giants, one can use established relationships between stellar mass, lifetime, and luminosity. The discussion highlights the need for common formulas rather than deriving them from scratch, as well as the importance of relating a star's age to its luminosity. Participants inquire about the necessity of such relationships and whether specific data, like the Sun's temperature and mass, is required for normalization. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the use of existing astronomical resources and formulas to find the necessary mass values. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately assessing the evolutionary stages of stars in the cluster.
Toad
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If the stars in the Pleiades open cluster are about 100*10^6 years old, how do I find the mass of the stars that evolved away from the main sequence to form red giants? Any suggestions or comments are welcome!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toad said:
If the stars in the Pleiades open cluster are about 100*10^6 years old, how do I find the mass of the stars that evolved away from the main sequence to form red giants? Any suggestions or comments are welcome!

What are you working from? Do they expect you to derive a relationship between mass and lifetime or just to know it?
 
SpaceTiger said:
What are you working from? Do they expect you to derive a relationship between mass and lifetime or just to know it?
The information I posted above is all I've been given. If there are common formulas for this available, I suppose I don't need to derive them.

Thanks!
 
Toad said:
The information I posted above is all I've been given. If there are common formulas for this available, I suppose I don't need to derive them.

See if this page helps:

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/MainSequence.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for that page. Is there some way to relate the age of the star to its luminosity? Do I need to do that?

Thanks!
 
Toad said:
Thanks for that page. Is there some way to relate the age of the star to its luminosity? Do I need to do that?

Does the problem ask for a luminosity?

Do yiou know how to normalize the relation I gave -- that is, do you know the temperature and mass of the sun?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top