- #1
Exactly, so assuming that an LCD-appropriate molecule must be polar, I would say A.a.a said:Fluorine is very elecronegative, even compared to N.
So I would then be A and D.
Just on the side, takeing a second look at C, it wouldn't be it because CH3 is on both sides, do does that mean its non-polar?
Yeschemisttree said:Would you say that a monofluoro methyl group attached to an aromatic group is reactive??)
I think No? If it would then it wouldn't be a very effective device, unless we say that there are no other solutions in the device that it can react withchemisttree said:Are LCD's supposed to be reactive?
Not sure on this, please correct me, but the longer the length the lower the melting point.chemisttree said:How might the length of the aliphatic tail of the molecule affect melting point?
Better?chemisttree said:Is an 11 carbon aliphatic group better or worse than a 5 carbon chain in this regard?
The molecule has to be polar because LCD devices use a magnet to charge to seprate the polar and non-polar portions so that the crystials allign in a certian way. This or something of this sort was the explanation that our professor gave us during the lecture on this topic, but she didnt spend much time on it.chemisttree said:How does a polar group affect a molecule's suitability as an LCD?
I think that it woud be best if the tails are polar...?chemisttree said:Surfactants have polar substituents and non-polar tails. Are surfactants good candidates for LCD's?
Cholesterol, if I am not mistaken is non-polar, which gets me confused. How would stacking affect the efficiency of liquid crystals in a LCD device?chemisttree said:Are molecules that have rigid backbones and will stack efficiently good candidates for LCD's? (hint: the prototype for the 'cholesteric' liquid crystal phase is the molecule "cholesterol". How polar is cholesterol?)
Gannon said:Wow, so this is much more complicated then I was led to believe; I'll leave you to it.
A polar molecule is a molecule that has a separation of electric charge, resulting in a positive and negative end. This occurs when there is an unequal distribution of electrons within the molecule, causing one end to have a slight positive charge and the other end to have a slight negative charge.
LCD devices, such as televisions and computer screens, use liquid crystals that react to electric fields to create images. Polar molecules are necessary for these electric fields to work effectively, so finding the most polar molecule is crucial for the proper functioning of these devices.
Scientists use a variety of methods to determine the polarity of a molecule, such as measuring the dipole moment, analyzing the molecular geometry, and using spectroscopic techniques. These methods allow scientists to determine the distribution of charge within a molecule and classify it as polar or nonpolar.
Some examples of polar molecules that are commonly used in LCD devices include nematic liquid crystals, such as 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl (5CB), which has a dipole moment of 4.8 Debyes, and smectic liquid crystals, such as 4-pentyl-4'-cyanobiphenyl (5CB), which has a dipole moment of 6.2 Debyes.
While polar molecules are necessary for LCD devices to function, there can be some drawbacks to using highly polar molecules. These molecules can be more difficult to synthesize and may have higher costs associated with them. Additionally, highly polar molecules may also have a shorter lifespan and be more sensitive to environmental factors, which can affect the overall performance of the LCD device.