Finding the number of elements in a cyclic group

hitmeoff
Messages
260
Reaction score
1
How do we go about finding the number of elements of a cyclic subgroup that's generated by an element in the main group. For example:

The subgroup Z30 generated by 25.

I would think this subgroup would be {0,1,5,25} but there's supposed to be 6 elements and not four. Whats going on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The operation in Z30 is addition, so your subgroup elements need to be generated by addition (for example, 25 + 25 = 20 (mod 30) must be in your subgroup).
 
hitmeoff said:
How do we go about finding the number of elements of a cyclic subgroup that's generated by an element in the main group. For example:

The subgroup Z30 generated by 25.

I would think this subgroup would be {0,1,5,25} but there's supposed to be 6 elements and not four. Whats going on?
How did you get that? 25+ 25= 50= 20 (mod 30). 25+ 25+ 25= 75= 15 (mod 30). 25+ 25+ 25+ 25= 100= 10 (mod 30). 25+ 25+ 25+ 25+ 25= 125= 5 (mod 30). 25+25+ 25+ 25+ 25+ 25= 150= 0 (mod 50). 25+25+ 25+ 25+ 25+ 25+ 25= 175= 25 (mod 30). Those are your 6 elements.
 
Thanks a lot guys. I guess I was just having a hard time reading my text and certain things weren't clear, I was confusing things.

You guys cleared it up.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Back
Top