Finding the Optimal Distance for Electron Tunneling in Gold

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The optimal distance L for electron tunneling in gold, with a work function of 5.1 eV and a transmission probability T of approximately 10-3, can be calculated using the formula T = Ge-2KL. Given that G = 1, the value of L must be determined by solving for K using K = sqrt(2m/h2 * (U-E)). The correct value of L is 0.1 nm, as it aligns with the calculated tunneling probability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly electron tunneling.
  • Familiarity with the work function concept in solid-state physics.
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation and its application in tunneling scenarios.
  • Proficiency in using mathematical formulas involving exponential decay.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the tunneling probability formula T = Ge-2KL.
  • Learn about the implications of the work function in different materials.
  • Explore the concept of quantum tunneling in semiconductor physics.
  • Investigate the role of mass (m) and Planck's constant (h) in quantum mechanics calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on solid-state physics, and anyone interested in the principles of electron tunneling in materials like gold.

LisaMG
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The work function (energy needed to remove an electron) of gold is 5.1 eV. Two pieces of gold (at the same potential) are separated by a distance L.

For what value of L will the transmission probability for an electron to cross from one to the other be T≈ 10-3? Assume that G = 1 in the formula for the tunneling probability.

fig14.gif
(a) L = 0.001 nm
(b) L = 0.02 nm
(c) L = 0.1 nm
(d) L = 0.3 nm
(e) L = 4 nm

Homework Equations


T= Ge^(-2KL)
K=sqrt(2m/h^2 * (U-E))

The Attempt at a Solution


I have my final tomorrow, this is a practice exam. I tried to solve for K using 5.1eV for (U-E) and then solve for L but I can't figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LisaMG said:
I tried to solve for K using 5.1eV for (U-E) and then solve for L but I can't figure it out.
The approach is good, so unless you show your work there is no way to tell what went wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K