Finding the potential energy if force depends on both position and time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining potential energy when force is dependent on both position and time, specifically with the force defined as f(r,t) = (k/r^2) * exp(-alpha*t). It is noted that this force is generally considered non-conservative due to its time-varying nature, although it can be treated as a pseudo potential if the time scale of motion is small compared to the rate of change of the potential. The utility of the potential concept is questioned, as energy conservation may not apply in this scenario. Participants suggest that directly using the force may be a simpler approach for calculations. Overall, the complexity of time-dependent forces complicates the definition and usefulness of potential energy.
swapnilp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How to find potential energy if force depends on both position of particle and time ?

Suppose force is : f(r,t) = (k/r^2) * exp(-alpha*t),
k, alpha = positive constants,
r = position of the particle from force-centre
t = time

Is this force a conservative or non-conservative ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A time varying potential is generally not considered conservative. However, if the time scale of the interesting motion is small compared to the rate the potential is changing, you can call this a pseudo potential. Over a short time scale the energy will approximately only depend only on position.
 
swapnilp said:
Is this force a conservative or non-conservative ?
The question is rather how useful the concept of a potential is here. You don't have the usual energy conservation over time. Depending on what you want to compute, using the force itself might be simpler.
 
Last edited:
With a highly time dependant force like the one you have there the concept of energy is not exactly defined or useful.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top