Finding the Right Revisiting a Two-Year-Old Problem

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the clarification of a probability problem involving dart throws, originally solved two years ago. The consensus is that the initial solution provided by the user, identified as "veronica1999," is indeed correct. The key takeaway is that while the probability of a dart hitting a specific region is known, the probabilities of combined outcomes when two darts are thrown simultaneously remain undefined. This distinction is crucial for accurately interpreting the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability concepts
  • Familiarity with dartboard mechanics and regions
  • Knowledge of event and outcome definitions in probability
  • Ability to differentiate between individual and combined event probabilities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of probability theory, focusing on independent and dependent events
  • Learn about probability distributions and their applications in real-world scenarios
  • Explore the concept of expected value in probability
  • Investigate simulations of dart throws to visualize outcomes and probabilities
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of probability, educators teaching probability concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of event outcomes in probabilistic experiments.

veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
veronica1999 said:
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?

Your original solution is correct.

You can think of the darts as thrown one after the other so the probability of an odd outcome is the sum of the probabilities that the first is odd and the second even and that the first is even and the second odd.

CB
 
veronica1999 said:
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?

Hi veronica1999,

As CaptainBlack had already told, your first answer is correct. Let me explain how I think about it.

What are the events and outcomes of this experiment? The problem says,

The probability that a dart will hit a given region is proportional to the area of the region.

Outcome 1: A dart hitting a region numbered "1".

Outcome 2: A dart hitting a region numbered "2".

We know the probabilities of these outcomes.

Then there are various events that could occur, for example the first dart hitting the outer region numbered 2 and the second dart hitting a inner region numbered 1. Out of these events we are interested about the events that have sum=3.

Suppose if you throw the two darts at the same time, and moreover they hit the board at the same instance. Then what will be the outcomes of this experiment? We may be able to define outcomes such as,

Outcome 1: The darts achieving a sum of "3".

Outcome 2: The darts not achieving a sum of "3".

However do we know the probabilities of these outcomes? No. You are given only the probabilities that a dart hitting a certain region, not the probabilities of the outcomes that occur when the two darts hit the board together.

What you have done wrong in the second method is that you have taken your outcomes as,

Outcome 1: A dart hitting a region numbered "1".

Outcome 2: A dart hitting a region numbered "2".

and done some calculations. But finally you have thought about the outcomes again as,

Outcome 1: The darts achieving a sum of "3".

Outcome 2: The darts not achieving a sum of "3".

The summary is, you can throw the darts at once, however the probabilities of the outcomes that you will get, you don't know.

I hope my explanation is clear enough to clarify your doubts.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K