MHB Finding the Right Revisiting a Two-Year-Old Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a two-year-old problem involving the probability of dart outcomes. The original solution is affirmed as correct, emphasizing that the probability of achieving an odd sum from two darts is the sum of specific individual probabilities. Clarification is provided that while the darts can be thrown simultaneously, the probabilities of the combined outcomes are not known based solely on the individual dart probabilities. Misunderstandings stem from incorrectly defining outcomes when considering the simultaneous throw of darts. The explanation aims to resolve confusion regarding the relationship between individual dart hits and the desired outcome probabilities.
veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
veronica1999 said:
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?

Your original solution is correct.

You can think of the darts as thrown one after the other so the probability of an odd outcome is the sum of the probabilities that the first is odd and the second even and that the first is even and the second odd.

CB
 
veronica1999 said:
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?

Hi veronica1999,

As CaptainBlack had already told, your first answer is correct. Let me explain how I think about it.

What are the events and outcomes of this experiment? The problem says,

The probability that a dart will hit a given region is proportional to the area of the region.

Outcome 1: A dart hitting a region numbered "1".

Outcome 2: A dart hitting a region numbered "2".

We know the probabilities of these outcomes.

Then there are various events that could occur, for example the first dart hitting the outer region numbered 2 and the second dart hitting a inner region numbered 1. Out of these events we are interested about the events that have sum=3.

Suppose if you throw the two darts at the same time, and moreover they hit the board at the same instance. Then what will be the outcomes of this experiment? We may be able to define outcomes such as,

Outcome 1: The darts achieving a sum of "3".

Outcome 2: The darts not achieving a sum of "3".

However do we know the probabilities of these outcomes? No. You are given only the probabilities that a dart hitting a certain region, not the probabilities of the outcomes that occur when the two darts hit the board together.

What you have done wrong in the second method is that you have taken your outcomes as,

Outcome 1: A dart hitting a region numbered "1".

Outcome 2: A dart hitting a region numbered "2".

and done some calculations. But finally you have thought about the outcomes again as,

Outcome 1: The darts achieving a sum of "3".

Outcome 2: The darts not achieving a sum of "3".

The summary is, you can throw the darts at once, however the probabilities of the outcomes that you will get, you don't know.

I hope my explanation is clear enough to clarify your doubts.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top