Finding the Scattering Angle of a Photon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the scattering angle of an electron after a photon is scattered at 60°. Using conservation of linear momentum and energy, the initial calculations yield a cosine value for the electron's angle of approximately 58.3°. However, when applying energy conservation, discrepancies arise, leading to a different momentum calculation for the electron. The final equation suggests a cosine value of 0.0107, indicating a significant difference in the expected angle. Participants emphasize the importance of reviewing equations and methods to identify errors in calculations.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Incident Photon λ = 0.1050*10^-9
Angle which photon is scattered (θ) = 60° (relative to intiial direction)

What angle is the electron scattered relaive to the original direction? (x)


Okay, so using linear momentum conservation:


(1) Incident photon momentum (p) = electron momentum (pe) * cos (x) + scattered photon momentum (q) * cos (60)


And (where λ' is the wavelength after scattering):
λ-λ' = h/mc (1-cosθ),
so pe*cos (x) = h/λ - h/λ'*2

pe*cos(x) = 3.2966*10^-24 (5sf)

And then usuing the scalar product of : pe = p - q to find pe:
eq. (2) : pe^2 = p^2+q^2 - 2pqcosθ
pe = 6.28*10^-24 (3sf)

Subbing this back into eq (1):
6.28*10^-24 (cos(x)) = 3.2966*10^-24
solving, cos (x) = 58.3°

However,
When I solve , still using eq (1) , but energy consevation rather than eq. 2 :
Incident photon energy (E) = Electron KE (A) + Scattered photon energy (B)
Then E-B= A
and E-B = hc/Δλ = hc/(2h/mc) = mc^2/2

Then electron KE = γmc^2 - mc^2 = mc^2/2
then : γ= 3/2
and solving γ for v^2, v^2= 5/9(c^2)

Therefore (pe) =mvλ = 3.056*10^-22 ( 4sf)

Finally, subbing this back into eq(1) : :confused: :frown:
pe*cos(x) = 3.2966*10^-24
3.056*10^-22*cos(x) = 3.2966*10^-24
and so cos (x) = 0.0107...

Any help greatly appreciated !Many , many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


E-B = hc/Δλ

Why not:
\frac{hc}{\lambda^\prime}-\frac{hc}{\lambda}
 


that is genius.
haha thank you :)
 


No worries - it's easier to spot these things in someone elses work than in your own.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top