Finding the Simplest Polynomial for a Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter PEZenfuego
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the simplest polynomial for a series using a method related to Newton's divided difference formula. A participant shares a resource that explains this method in detail, noting that while their approach differs slightly, the core principles are similar. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding why the method works, referencing Newton's polynomial for further clarity. The shared links provide additional context and resources for those interested in the mathematical foundations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the utility of established formulas in simplifying polynomial expressions for series.
PEZenfuego
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I cannot for the life of me remember where I learned to do this nor can I remember why this works, but I know a method for finding the simplest polynomial for a series. I had something half typed up and then I found this site: http://www.johansens.us/sane/technotes/formula.htm which explains a method more thoroughly. While this is not identical to the way I do it, it is certainly similar enough.

So why does this work?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top